- Examine the claim that crime is a product of social and legal construction.
- Is ‘criminalization’ a useful framework for understanding how we define and respond to certain forms of conduct?
- What does it mean to say that crime is historically contingent and what can contemporary criminologists learn from studying the historical development of crime?
- Examine and explain the distinction between formal and substantive criminalization.
- What can criminologists learn from criminal law scholarship and what can criminal lawyers learn from criminology?
- What are the most important developments in criminalization over recent decades and how best can they be explained?
- What is meant by ‘over-criminalization’ and why does it matter?
- Discuss the claim that ‘criminology has largely failed to be self-reflective regarding the dominant, state defined notion of “crime”.’
- Evaluate the validity of criminological critiques of the liberal account of crime as a means of holding individuals to account for wrongful conduct.