Quiz Content

not completed
. A moral Argument from Analogy is:

not completed
. According to the chapter, Arguments from Analogy are valuable because they:

not completed
. When an argument fits the General Form of Argument from Analogy, it will rely upon claims about the target controversial case and another supposedly analogous (and less controversial) case. In this form of argument, the first premise:

not completed
. When an argument fits the General Form of Argument from Analogy, it will rely upon claims about the target controversial case and another supposedly analogous (and less controversial) case. In this form of argument, the second premise:

not completed
. True or false: In an Argument from Analogy, the less controversial case is usually case x (the case discussed in premise 1).

not completed
. The General Form of Argument from Analogy describes the pattern an Argument from Analogy takes when represented in standard form. According to the chapter, how can this pattern help you represent an Argument from Analogy in standard form?

not completed
. The General Form of Argument from Analogy describes the pattern an Argument from Analogy takes when represented in standard form. Use this pattern to determine: what is case x in the following argument? "It is clearly morally justifiable for the government to enforce mask mandates during a pandemic. This should be clear, since it's obviously justifiable for the government to ban smoking in public buildings (like hospitals, schools, restaurants, and stores), and that's, morally speaking, no different."

not completed
. The General Form of Argument from Analogy describes the pattern an Argument from Analogy takes when represented in standard form. Use this pattern to determine: what is case y in the following argument? "It is clearly morally justifiable for the government to enforce mask mandates during a pandemic. This should be clear, since it's obviously justifiable for the government to ban smoking in public buildings (like hospitals, schools, restaurants, and stores), and that's, morally speaking, no different."

not completed
. The General Form of Argument from Analogy describes the pattern an Argument from Analogy takes when represented in standard form. Use this pattern to determine: what is moral status S in the following argument? "It is clearly morally justifiable for the government to enforce mask mandates during a pandemic. This should be clear, since it's obviously justifiable for the government to ban smoking in public buildings (like hospitals, schools, restaurants, and stores), and that's, morally speaking, no different."

not completed
. Consider this argument: "It is clearly morally justifiable for the government to enforce mask mandates during a pandemic. This should be clear, since it's obviously justifiable for the government to ban smoking in public buildings (like hospitals, schools, restaurants, and stores), and that's, morally speaking, no different." When representing this argument in standard form using the General Form of Argument from Analogy, premise 1 would say:

not completed
. Consider this argument: "It is clearly morally justifiable for the government to enforce mask mandates during a pandemic. This should be clear, since it's obviously justifiable for the government to ban smoking in public buildings (like hospitals, schools, restaurants, and stores), and that's, morally speaking, no different." When representing this argument in standard form using the General Form of Argument from Analogy, premise 2 would say:

not completed
. Consider this argument: "It is clearly morally justifiable for the government to enforce mask mandates during a pandemic. This should be clear, since it's obviously justifiable for the government to ban smoking in public buildings (like hospitals, schools, restaurants, and stores), and that's, morally speaking, no different." When representing this argument in standard form using the General Form of Argument from Analogy, the conclusion would say:

Back to top