Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Public Law 3e Student Resources
Chapter 13 Multiple choice questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements describes the facts of
Associated Provincial Picture Houses Ltd v Wednesbury Corporation
?
Challenge to a local council's decision to permit the showing of films on Sundays, on the condition that children under 15 should not be admitted.
correct
incorrect
Challenge to a Home Office policy permitting prison officers the authority to search prisoners' cells, including their private correspondence.
correct
incorrect
Challenge to a local council's decision to increase the wage of its employees by 100%
correct
incorrect
Challenge to the UK government's ratification of the Maastricht Treaty.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
How does Lord Greene define unreasonableness in
Wednesbury
?
Manifestly unfair
correct
incorrect
Something so absurd that no sensible person could ever dream that the act in question lay within the powers of the authority
correct
incorrect
Something that is not only unlawful, in the sense that it is contrary to statute, but also breaches individuals' human rights
correct
incorrect
Something that is entirely disproportionate to the intended objective
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which pre-
Wednesbury
case also demonstrates the relevance of the 'unreasonableness' principle to decision-making?
Roberts v Hopwood
correct
incorrect
Entick v Carrington
correct
incorrect
Dr Bonham's Case
correct
incorrect
Wheeler v Leicester City Council
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Leicester City Council's actions in barring the rugby club from using the local recreation ground were found to be unreasonable in
Wheeler v Leicester City Council.
True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In
R v Ministry of Defence ex p Smith
[1996], what government policy did the Court of Appeal find
not
to be unreasonable?
The policy setting out the wage level of those in the armed forces
correct
incorrect
The policy clarifying the length of time a member of the armed forces could be sent away on active service
correct
incorrect
The policy forbidding homosexual individuals from being in the armed forces
correct
incorrect
The policy setting out changes to military dress
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which case did the House of Lords reject a proportionality (and ECHR) argument in respect of the Home Secretary's prohibition of the broadcast by individuals representing terrorist organisations?
R (Dal
y
)
v Secretary of State for the Home Department
correct
incorrect
R v Barnsley Metropolitan Council, ex p Hook
correct
incorrect
R v Chief Constable of Kent, ex p Absalom
correct
incorrect
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex p Brind
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which case did Lord Steyn note the following? '[T]here is an overlap between the traditional grounds of review and the approach of proportionality. Most cases would be decided in the same way whichever approach is adopted. But the intensity of review is somewhat greater under the proportionality approach.'
R (Dal
y
)
v Secretary of State for the Home Department
correct
incorrect
R (Alconbury Lt
d
)
v Secretary of State for the Environment
correct
incorrect
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department ex p Brind
correct
incorrect
R (Association of British Civilian Internees: Far East Regio
n
)
v Secretary of State for Defence
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In
R (Association of British Civilian Internees: Far East Region) v Secretary of State for Defence
, which court did Dyson LJ say should not 'perform [the] burial rites' of
Wednesbury
unreasonableness?
The European Court of Human Rights
correct
incorrect
The Appellate Committee of the House of Lords
correct
incorrect
The Court of Appeal
correct
incorrect
The Supreme Court
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Wednesbury
unreasonableness is no longer valid law. True or false?
False
correct
incorrect
True
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In
Keyu v Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs
, how many Supreme Court justices did Lord Neuberger say should appropriately be called upon to consider replacing
Wednesbury
unreasonableness with proportionality?
11
correct
incorrect
9
correct
incorrect
7
correct
incorrect
12
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country