.png){kind=icon}
- Lord Carnwath, ‘From judicial outrage to sliding scales – where next for Wednesbury?’ (ALBA Annual Lecture, 12 November 2013)
- Lord Carnwath, ‘From Rationality to Proportionality in the Modern Law’ (UCL-HKU Conference: Judicial review in a changing society, 14 April 2014)
- Mark Elliott, ‘Where next for the Wednesbury principle? A brief response to Lord Carnwath’ (UK Constitutional Law Association, 20 November 2013)
- Jake W Rylatt and Joseph Tomlinson, ‘Neuberger’s Novelties: Keyu and the Substantive Review Debate’ (UK Constitutional Law Association, 17 February 2016)
- Tim Sayer and Colin Murray, ‘A Tale of Two Doctrines: Revaluating Bifurcation in Substantive Review before the Supreme Court’ [2021] Public Law 47
- Tim Sayer, ‘Manifest Unreasonableness in the UK Supreme Court: A Doctrine Working Itself Pure’ (2022) King’s Law Journal
- Hanna Wilberg and Mark Elliott (eds), The Scope and Intensity of Substantive Review: Traversing Taggert’s Rainbow (Hart 2015)
- Philip Sales, ‘Proportionality Review in Appellate Courts’ (2021) 26(1) Judicial Review 40
- Paul Craig, ‘Varying Intensity of Judicial Review: A Conceptual Analysis’, [2022] Public Law (early view available on SSRN)
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024