Public Law 2e Student Resources is no longer available and it was replaced by Public Law 3e.
Chapter 10 Further reading and web links
Judicial review: access to review and remedies
- Mark Elliott, ‘Judicial Review Reform – The Report of the Joint Committee on Human Rights’ (UK Constitutional Law Association, 1 May 2014), https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2014/05/01/mark-elliott-judicial-review-reform-the-report-of-the-joint-committee-on-human-rights/
- Mark Elliott, ‘The Ultra Vires Doctrine in a Constitutional Setting: Still the Central Principle of Administrative Law’ (1999) 58(1) Cambridge Law Journal 129
- Thomas Fairclough, ‘Privacy International: Constitutional Substance over Semantics in Reading Ouster Clauses’ (UK Constitutional Law Association, 4 December 2017), https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2017/12/04/thomas-fairclough-privacy-international-constitutional-substance-over-semantics-in-reading-ouster-clauses/
- JAG Griffith, The Politics of the Judiciary (Fontana Press, 5th edn, 1997), Chapter 4
- Joint Committee on Human Rights, ‘The implications for access to justice of the Government’s proposals to reform judicial review’ (HL Paper 174, HC 868, 30 April 2014), https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/jt201314/jtselect/jtrights/174/174.pdf
- Ministry of Justice, ‘Civil Procedure Rules’, https://www.justice.gov.uk/courts/procedure-rules/civil.
- Adam Tucker, ‘Parliamentary Intention, Anisminic, and the Privacy International Case’ (UK Constitutional Law Association, 18 December 2018 (Part One) and 19 December 2018 (Part Two), https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2018/12/18/adam-tucker-parliamentary-intention-anisminic-and-the-privacy-international-case-part-one/ (Part One); https://ukconstitutionallaw.org/2018/12/19/adam-tucker-parliamentary-intention-anisminic-and-the-privacy-international-case-part-two/ (Part Two).