Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Chapter 6 Multiple choice questions
Return to Evidence Concentrate 7e Student Resources
Chapter 6 Multiple choice questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements is correct?
All common law exceptions are preserved in s118 CJA 2003.
correct
incorrect
The rule against hearsay only applies to prosecution evidence
correct
incorrect
The same rules apply to criminal and civil hearsay
correct
incorrect
In civil proceedings the rule has been effectively abolished in the Civil Evidence Act 1995
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In
R v Blastland
(1986) B was charged with murder. He wished to adduce evidence that another man had made various statements suggesting he had knowledge of the murder before it was made public. Munday (
Cross and Tapper on Evidence,
13
th
edn OUP, 2018, p584) commented, 'The House of Lords held evidence of such knowledge inadmissible, adopting a very narrow view of its relevance'. Munday cites in a footnote a possible statutory route to such evidence in some cases. Which is the section he cites?
S117 CJA 2003
correct
incorrect
S118 CJA 2003
correct
incorrect
S116 (2)(e) CJA 2003
correct
incorrect
None of the above
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
X, a passenger sitting on the top of a bus, sees a cyclist knocked by a car in the street and the car being driven off. She records its number plate in her phone. G, another bus passenger and a stranger to X, contacts the police and reads out the number from X's phone. He had not seen the car. The driver is traced and faces trial for dangerous driving. He denies the charge. X is not traceable. Can the prosecution present at trial evidence of G's phone call to the police?
Yes, see CJA 2003 s116
correct
incorrect
No, see CJA 2003 s124
correct
incorrect
No, see CJA2003 s114 (1)(d)
correct
incorrect
Yes, see CJA 2003 s118
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements is correct?
The Civil Evidence Act 1995 refers only to first hand hearsay
correct
incorrect
The Civil Evidence Act 1995 refers only to oral hearsay
correct
incorrect
The Civil Evidence Act 1995 refers to both first hand and multiple hearsay
correct
incorrect
The Civil Evidence Act 1995 defines a statement as a representation of fact only
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements is true?
S116 CJA 2003 does not cover firsthand oral hearsay.
correct
incorrect
The Law Commission Report 1997 recommended that the rule against hearsay be abolished
correct
incorrect
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 does not preserve the common law exception dying declarations.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of these statements is correct?
The agreement of the parties does not make hearsay admissible in criminal proceedings
correct
incorrect
There is no inclusionary discretion to allow for the admissibility of otherwise inadmissible hearsay
correct
incorrect
There is no inclusionary discretion for multiple hearsay.
correct
incorrect
The Criminal Justice Act 2003 allows for the admissibility of written business documents under s117
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Consider the following scenario:
Joan, wife of Leo, makes a statement to the police who had advised her that she was not compellable to give evidence against Leo who is facing trial for the alleged assault on their nineteen year old daughter. Joan refuses to testify at the trial. Is her pre-trial statement admissible?
Yes, in principle under s114(1)(d) CJA 2003
correct
incorrect
No, because of s80 PACE 1984
correct
incorrect
Yes, because of s78 PACE 1984
correct
incorrect
Yes because of the common law inclusionary discretion to admit evidence
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which case was the following principle enunciated?
Allowing a witness statement to be admitted as evidence where the witness is not available for cross-examination, and that evidence is the sole or decisive basis for convicting the accused is not necessarily a violation of Article 6(1) and 6(3)(d).
Allan v UK
(2004)
correct
incorrect
Al-Khawaja and Tahery v UK
(2012)
correct
incorrect
Doorson v Netherlands
(1996)
correct
incorrect
Trivedi v UK
(1997)
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements concerning statements of intention is true?
In
R v Blastland
(1986) the House of Lords approved the decision in
Moghal
(1977) where the Court of Appeal held that a tape-recording by the accused's mistress was admissible to suggest she carried out the murder
correct
incorrect
In
R v Thomson
(1912) a statement by the victim that she had intended to carry out an abortion on herself was not admissible in a trial of her alleged murderer
correct
incorrect
Section 118 (1)4(c) Criminal Justice Act 2003 does not preserve the common law exception to the rule against hearsay for statements of intention
correct
incorrect
In
R v Valentine
(1996) an earlier statement of intention by an alleged rapist was inadmissible as relevant to his
mens rea
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following is correct in relation to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s114 (1)(d)?
It is available only to the defence
correct
incorrect
It is available only to the prosecution
correct
incorrect
It is available to both prosecution and defence
correct
incorrect
It is not available if the evidence is inadmissible under another section of the statute
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country