Evidence Concentrate 6e Resources is no longer available and it was replaced by Evidence Concentrate 7e.
Chapter 3 key debates
Chapter 3 key debates
Confessions and the defendant’s silence
Topic |
Is the test for allowing inferences to be drawn from silence on legal advice too harsh? |
Author |
B Malik |
Viewpoint |
Reviews the differing approaches of the Court of Appeal in R v Betts and Hall (2001) and R v Howell (2003). In the latter the court held that genuine reliance on legal advice, as accepted in Betts and Hall, was not sufficient: it had also to be reasonable. Suggests that consequently the suspect is having to ‘second guess’ the jury and calculate whether it will believe that reliance on legal advice was the true reason for his or her silence. |
Source |
‘Silence on Legal Advice: Clarity but Not Justice? R v Beckles’ (2005) 9/3 E&P 211 |
Topic |
Importance of availability of legal advice for suspect at police interview |
Author |
I Dennis |
Viewpoint |
Cadder (2010) will have a clear impact on English law. It is likely to lead to exclusion of a confession in the overwhelming number of cases where a suspect makes a confession after requesting legal advice in vain. |
Source |
‘Legal Advice in Police Stations: 25 Years On’ [2011] Crim LR 1 |