Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Chapter 5 Self-test questions
Return to Human Rights Law Concentrate 4e Resources
Chapter 5 Self-test questions
Right to liberty and right to fair trial
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
The right to liberty and the right to a fair trial are
Absolute rights
correct
incorrect
Limited rights
correct
incorrect
Qualified rights
correct
incorrect
Social rights
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following cases laid down the criteria for deciding if there has been a 'deprivation of liberty' under article 5 of the ECHR?:
Brand v. Netherlands
(2004)
correct
incorrect
H.L. v UK
(2004)
correct
incorrect
Murray v UK
(1994)
correct
incorrect
Guzzardi v Italy
(1980)
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Stafford v UK
(2002) held that
Detaining prisoners under sentencing rules that allow for indeterminate sentencing are compatible with Article 5 as long as the original decision to detain was in accordance with law. Any future decision regarding detention is unnecessary
correct
incorrect
Detaining prisoners under sentencing rules that allow for indeterminate sentencing are compatible with Article 5 as long as there is a link between the sentence passed by the court and the reason for continuing detention
correct
incorrect
Detaining prisoners under sentencing rules that allow for indeterminate sentencing are compatible with Article 5 as long as the state has derogated from the ECHR
correct
incorrect
Detaining prisoners under sentencing rules that allow for indeterminate sentencing are compatible with Article 5 if the applicant is a danger to society
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
General principles that should be applied when the state detains a person on the grounds of unsound mind under article 5(1)(e) were laid down in which case?
Winterwerp v Netherlands
(1979)
correct
incorrect
Brand v. Netherlands
(2004)
correct
incorrect
Saadi v UK
(2008)
correct
incorrect
Barfuss v Czech Republic
(2000)
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In the domestic cases of
Secretary of State for the Home Department v JJ and Others
[2007] and
Secretary of State for the Home Department v E
[2007], the House of Lords (now known as the Supreme Court) found a violation of article 5 in
JJ
but not in
E
. What was the reason for this difference?
JJ had mental health issues, which E did not have
correct
incorrect
The state were not able to demonstrate a link between the continuing detention of JJ and the original decision to detain, whereas in
E
they could establish this
correct
incorrect
In
JJ
the decision maker was not an independent body, whereas in
E
there was independence
correct
incorrect
On the facts, JJ's conditions under the Control Order amounted to a deprivation of liberty. E's conditions did not. E's conditions amounted to a restriction of liberty not covered by article 5.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements is false?:
The right to a fair trial under article 6 in the ECHR covers criminal charges
correct
incorrect
The right to a fair trial under article 6 in the ECHR covers civil law where civil rights and obligations are in question
correct
incorrect
The right to a fair trial under article 6 in the ECHR covers civil law cases involving employment rights
correct
incorrect
The right to a fair trial under article 6 in the ECHR covers administrative and public areas of civil law
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The European Court of Human Rights has interpreted article 6 to include certain 'implied obligations'. Which of the following is not an implied obligation?:
Equality of arms
correct
incorrect
Access to a Court
correct
incorrect
Legal aid
correct
incorrect
Right to participate in hearing
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Article 6(3) guarantees explicit minimum rights for anyone charged with a criminal offence. Which of the following is not included?:
To be informed promptly, in a language which he understands and in detail, of the nature and cause of the accusation against him
correct
incorrect
To have the free assistance of an interpreter if he cannot understand or speak the language used in court
correct
incorrect
To be presumed innocent until proven guilty
correct
incorrect
To defend himself in person or through legal assistance of his own choosing or, if he has not sufficient means to pay for legal assistance, to be given it free when the interests of justice so require
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which UK case did the House of Lords (now known as the Supreme Court) decide that special advocates in closed hearings under terrorism legislation should be allowed to communicate to the controllee an irreducible minimum of information regarding the case against them?
R v Secretary of State DETR ex p Alconbury Developments Ltd
et al (2001)
correct
incorrect
Cadder v HM Advocate
(2010)
correct
incorrect
Brown v Stott
(2001)
correct
incorrect
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AF
(2009)
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The right to liberty and the right to fair trial were first guaranteed in the UK in
Bill of Rights 1689
correct
incorrect
Magna Carta 1215
correct
incorrect
European Convention on Human Rights
correct
incorrect
Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country