Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Part III: Contemporary Moral Problems
Multiple Choice Quiz
Quiz Content
*
not completed
Thomson reports that when confronted with the
Trolley
Driver
case, where the driver can turn the trolley onto the track with one to save the five:
everybody thinks it is morally permissible to turn.
correct
incorrect
some people think it is morally required to turn.
correct
incorrect
both a and b.
correct
incorrect
neither a nor b.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
Thomson reports that when confronted with
Fat Man
, where one can push the one to save the five:
some think it is morally permissible to push.
correct
incorrect
everyone thinks it is morally impermissible to push.
correct
incorrect
some think that pushing is morally required.
correct
incorrect
none of the above.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
Thomson claims that it is
not
obvious that if in order to get the switch thrown, the bystander must use a sharply pointed tool, and the only available sharply pointed tool is a nailfile that belongs to the one:
it is permissible to throw the switch.
correct
incorrect
it is impermissible to throw the switch.
correct
incorrect
throwing the switch is required.
correct
incorrect
throwing the switch is supererogatory.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
Thomson claims that we can solve the trolley problem by:
relying on the distinction between "killing" and "letting die."
correct
incorrect
relying on the notion of using someone as a "mere means."
correct
incorrect
relying on the concept of a "right."
correct
incorrect
none of the above
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
According to Thomson, one way to test if we are using someone, X, as a mere means is by asking:
If X had gone out of existence would I be able to perform the act?
correct
incorrect
If X had not consented would I be able to perform the act?
correct
incorrect
If X could not consent would I be able to perform the act?
correct
incorrect
If X could not rationally consent would I be able to perform the act?
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
Thomson maintains that if one would infringe a right by acting:
it is sufficient justification for acting that one would thereby maximize utility.
correct
incorrect
it is not sufficient justification for acting that one would thereby maximize utility.
correct
incorrect
it is necessary justification for acting that one would thereby maximize utility.
correct
incorrect
it is not necessary justification for acting that one would thereby maximize utility.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
Thomson notes that the bystander does
not make something be a threat to people which would otherwise not be a threat to anyone; rather:
he makes be a threat to fewer what is already a threat to more.
correct
incorrect
he makes be a threat to more what was a threat to a few.
correct
incorrect
he introduces a new threat to fewer to prevent an existing threat to many.
correct
incorrect
he introduces a new threat to many to prevent an existing threat to a few.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
According to Thomson, the right to not be toppled off a footbridge onto a trolley track is:
illusory.
correct
incorrect
a weak right.
correct
incorrect
a moderately strong right.
correct
incorrect
a stringent right.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country