Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Family law 1e Student Resources
Chapter 4 Self-test questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
When does a financial remedy order take effect?
When the divorce proceedings are issued
correct
incorrect
After decree nisi
correct
incorrect
After decree absolute
correct
incorrect
From the date the order is made
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements is correct?
If no agreement is reached on finances once decree absolute is pronounced, neither party can make a request for a financial settlement.
correct
incorrect
As long as there is a clear agreement in writing about finances, there is no need for a court order once decree absolute is pronounced.
correct
incorrect
No agreement over finance is enforceable unless a court order has been made.
correct
incorrect
If no financial remedy order is made within 10 years of decree absolute, it is no longer possible for either party to make a claim.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Legal aid is never available for divorce of financial remedy proceedings. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In what circumstances will periodical payments under s.23(1) end? Choose all that apply.
On the remarriage or civil partnership of the recipient
correct
incorrect
On cohabitation of the recipient
correct
incorrect
On the death of the payer
correct
incorrect
At the end of a term under s.28(1A)
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What is the difference between orders made under s.24(1)(a) and s.24(1)(b)?
s.24(1)(a)
is an order changing the ownership of property and s.24(1)(b) is an order for a lump sum of money.
correct
incorrect
s.24(1)(a)
is an order changing the ownership of property and s.24(1)(b) is an order for property to be held on trust.
correct
incorrect
s.24(1)(a)
is an order for maintenance and s.24(1)(b) is an order for property to be held on trust.
correct
incorrect
s.24(1)(a)
is an order for property to be held on trust and s.24(1)(b) is an order for a lump sum of money.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
A pension attachment order is a type of clean break order. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What steps can the court take in relation to debts held by one or both parties? Choose all that apply.
Order a creditor to release a party from the debt
correct
incorrect
Order assets to be sold to pay off the debts
correct
incorrect
Accept undertakings from one party to pay the debt
correct
incorrect
Order a transfer of the debt
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In deciding what is a fair distribution of assets, the welfare of any child of the family the court's paramount concern. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What is the average annual cost of putting a child in a nursery for 25 hours a week?
£4,000
correct
incorrect
£6,000
correct
incorrect
£8,000
correct
incorrect
£10,000
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
How many of the factors under s.25(2) does the court have to consider when deciding how to exercise its powers?
4
correct
incorrect
5
correct
incorrect
7
correct
incorrect
8
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
When considering contributions, the court is concerned with financial contributions only. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What type of conduct might be taken into account under s.25(2)(g)? Choose all that apply.
Adultery
correct
incorrect
Hiding assets
correct
incorrect
Serious violence such as attempted murder
correct
incorrect
Threatening behaviour
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In addition to the list of factors to consider, s.25 sets out a clear rationale for what a fair distribution of assets looks like. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What important change was brought in by the Married Women's Property Act 1882?
Secular divorce courts were established
correct
incorrect
Women could petition for divorce
correct
incorrect
A married woman could hold property separately to her husband
correct
incorrect
Enabled the courts to order the provision of capital
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
When was the common law duty of a husband to maintain his wife abolished?
1857
correct
incorrect
1882
correct
incorrect
1963
correct
incorrect
2010
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In
Wachtel v Wachtel
[1972] Fam72(CA) why did Lord Denning say that a husband needs more money than a wife after divorce?
Because he would have to pay someone to do the housework, but a woman could do this for herself.
correct
incorrect
Because a wife's' reasonable requirements could never amount to more than 30% of her husband's income.
correct
incorrect
Because the husband was entitled to keep more of the money that he had earned.
correct
incorrect
Because the wife could go out to work to support herself after the divorce.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
How did the case of
White v White
[2001] 1 AC 596 fundamentally change the way in which cases were decided?
It introduced the concept of reasonable requirements.
correct
incorrect
It introduced the concept of the yardstick of equality for dividing marital assets.
correct
incorrect
It introduced the principles of compensation and sharing for dividing marital assets.
correct
incorrect
It introduced the concept of valuing contributions made to the welfare of the family.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The concept of need is-fact specific and the court has a wide discretion when assessing what qualifies as need. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In which case did the House of Lords first introduce the principle of compensation when deciding on a fair division of assets?
White v White
correct
incorrect
Radmacher v Granatino
correct
incorrect
M
iller v Miller/Macfarlane v Macfarlane
correct
incorrect
Mills-McCartney
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following would normally be regarded as marital assets? Choose all that apply.
The family home owned by the husband in his sole name.
correct
incorrect
A holiday cottage owned the wife in her sole name which is used for family holidays.
correct
incorrect
A savings account with money inherited by the wife from her mother.
correct
incorrect
A savings account with money set aside from the husband's salary from money earned during the marriage.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements most accurately describes the way in which principles of needs, compensation, and sharing are used by the court to reach a fair outcome?
Each one must be considered separately and applied to the factual situation, looking at need first.
correct
incorrect
The court must always consider the need for compensation before considering needs and sharing.
correct
incorrect
The court should only use these principles in big money cases where there is a surplus after the needs of the children are met.
correct
incorrect
All three strands work together and the significance or each strand will depend on the circumstances of the case.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
If the parties to a marriage have an agreement as to how to resolve any financial issues on divorce, the court must still look at s.25 to decide if this is fair before making an order. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Why did the case of
Radmacher v Granatino
[2010] UKSC 42 lead to a significant change in relation to prenuptial agreements?
It introduced a public policy issue that courts should not uphold agreements that anticipated marital breakdown.
correct
incorrect
It made pre-nuptial agreements binding unless there were children in the marriage.
correct
incorrect
It introduced the principle that agreements that were freely entered into should be upheld as long as it would be fair to do so.
correct
incorrect
It introduced the rule that the court must uphold all pre-nuptial agreements regardless of whether it would be fair to do so.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In what circumstances might the court decide that it would be unfair to hold the parties to a pre-nuptial agreement? Choose all that apply.
If neither party had legal advice at the time of signing the agreement.
correct
incorrect
If the economically weaker spouse would have got a larger financial settlement without the agreement.
correct
incorrect
If the agreement does not make adequate provision for the children.
correct
incorrect
If there was no disclosure of financial information at the time the agreement was signed.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What power does the court in England and Wales have under the Matrimonial and Family Law Proceedings Act 1984 if a divorce has been granted in another country?
The court in England and Wales must implement any financial orders made in that country
correct
incorrect
The court in England and Wales can make its own order in relation to financial matters, even if the court in the other country has already made an order.
correct
incorrect
The court in England and Wales must apply the s.25 criteria from the MCA 1973 and make an order based on these regardless of what order has been made in the other country.
correct
incorrect
The court in England and Wales can make fresh financial orders, but only in relation to the matrimonial home.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In order to get leave to pursue an application under the Matrimonial and Family Law Proceedings Act 1984 the applicant must show that the foreign order caused them hardship or led to an injustice. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The majority of financial orders are complied with and enforcement applications are rare. True or false?
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
If one party refuses to sign documents to give effect to an order for the sale or transfer of property, what can a judge do to enforce the order?
Make an attachment of earnings order.
correct
incorrect
Commit the debtor to prison for contempt of court.
correct
incorrect
Impose a charging order on the property.
correct
incorrect
Sign the documents themselves to effect the transfer.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements is correct? Choose all that apply.
It is only possible to appeal a financial remedy order if the judge made an error of law.
correct
incorrect
Either party can appeal an order that they consider to be unfair.
correct
incorrect
An order can be appealed where there has been misrepresentation or fraud.
correct
incorrect
An order can be appealed when event occur that radically change the circumstances in which the order was made.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Hassan and Ida have been married for 15 years. Hassan runs a business with his brother Jahmil and they are both very wealthy men. They inherited the company from their father and built is up together. Hassan and Ida have two children, aged 10 and 13 years of age and Ida has not worked outside the home since the oldest child was born. She is a qualified solicitor and had a job in a large corporate firm before she married Hassan. The marriage has now broken down as Ida has had an affair with someone she met on the school parents' association. Hassan's assets, including his share of the business and a number of savings and investments come to £50 million. The couple also jointly own two properties, one in London and one in the South of France. The family home in London is worth £3 million and the villa in France £2 million. Ida is asking for 50% of all Hassan's assets and for the house in London to be transferred into her sole name. She is willing to let Hassan keep the house in France. Hassan is not willing to share any of the family business, and wants to sell both properties and share the proceeds 50:50. He is willing to give Ida a lump sum of £5 million from savings and investments that he owns. Which of the following statements best summarises the principles that will apply in this case?
The court will consider Ida's reasonable needs in deciding what sum to award her. As Ida has professional qualifications the court will consider her earning capacity and expect her to be able to support herself financially following the divorce.
correct
incorrect
As Hassan's wealth is inherited, the court will not consider the to be marital property to be divided on divorce. Therefore, the only assets relevant for consideration are the two properties and Hassan's savings and investments.
correct
incorrect
As Hassan's wealth has come in part from an inheritance, this is a reason for the court to depart from the yardstick of equality, but if the business has grown in value over the course of the marriage, the value will be considered as a marital asset for sharing.
correct
incorrect
As Ida has had an affair the court will take her conduct in bringing the marriage to an end into account which will reduce any award payable.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Logan and Kaiden are civil partners. They have been together for six years and entered into a civil partnership just a few months after they met. Kaiden is 20 years younger than Logan and is an artist. He met Logan when he was 19 years old and was at art college. Logan is a successful landscape gardener with his own company. He designs gardens all over world, owns a garden centre and has a large workforce. When he and Kaiden first met, his friends and family were worried that Kaiden was just after his money. They persuaded him that he should ask for Kaiden to sign a pre-nuptial agreement because it was such a whirlwind romance. The pre-nuptial agreement stated that if the civil partnership broke down Kaiden would not make any financial claim against Logan's property or income. At the time, Kaiden signed it saying, "I'm not even going to read this, I don't care about your money, I just want to be with you." The civil partnership has now broken down because Logan has met someone else. Kaiden has no regular income and has never had a job. He has a studio in the garden of Logan's house and makes large sculptures which he sells. He is beginning to make money from the sculptures and in the past year has made £20,000 in sales. He has made an application for financial orders on the dissolution of the civil partnership. He wants a lump sum so that he can buy himself a property with space for a sculpture studio and an income of £20,000 for three years while he finds a way to support himself financially. Logan is relying on the pre-nuptial agreement and refusing to provide Kaiden with anything at all, saying that he is not a very talented artist and needs to just get a job like everyone else. Kaiden claims that he did not understand the significance of the agreement when he signed it, and that he also had no idea how much Logan was worth. He claims Logan promised to help him establish himself as an artist should be held to that promise. What advice would you give to Logan?
Pre-nuptial agreements are not binding in English law as a matter of policy as this would fetter the court's discretion to make financial orders on divorce. Logan will therefore need to make some financial provision for Kaiden.
correct
incorrect
The court will normally give effect to a pre-nuptial agreement unless it would be unfair to do so. In this case Kaiden did not have independent advice and will be left in predicament of real need if he receives nothing. The court may therefore consider this unfair.
correct
incorrect
The court must give effect to a pre-nuptial agreement unless it was entered into under duress or unless there has been significant change in circumstances since the agreement was entered into, neither of which apply in this case.
correct
incorrect
The court will normally give effect to a pre-nuptial agreement unless doing so would discriminate against a home-maker and leave children of the marriage in a predicament of real need. As there are no children, nor is Kaiden a home-maker, this court will not be able to make an financial award.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Maia and Noam have been married for 20 years. Maia has had a successful career in publishing and Noam is a writer who has only published one book in all the time they have been together. They have four children aged from 15 to 8 years old and Noam has always been the main homemaker and has looked after the children. Maia only ever took three months' maternity leave with each child. The marriage has now broken down. The family home is owned in their joint names and is worth £1 million. It is a large five-bedroom house in Oxford close to the children's schools. There is a mortgage of £100,000 left. Maia has a pension with her employer, but other than that the couple have no savings or assets. Noam wants the house transferred to his sole name so that he and the children can continue to live there. He also wants Maia to pay him enough maintenance to cover the mortgage. Maia wants the house sold and split so that they can both buy somewhere smaller and in a cheaper area. She does not think that Noam should have a share of her pension. She complains that he has not contributed anything financially to the marriage. The house is half hers and she has paid the mortgage all these years so she does not see why he should be entitled to is. Which of the following statements of the legal position is most accurate?
This is a long marriage which means that the court will apply the yardstick of equality and the assets should be shared equally meaning the house will should be sold and divided and Noam given a share in Maia's pension.
correct
incorrect
Under s.25 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 the court have to consider the needs of the children as paramount meaning that the Noam will need to be provided with a home and income to continue bringing up the children.
correct
incorrect
Under s.25 Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 the court will look at a range of criteria including the needs of the children, the needs of the parties, their contribution to the welfare of the marriage and their respective resources. Noam will be entitled to a financial settlement.
correct
incorrect
The court will consider the principles of need, compensation and sharing when deciding on a financial settlement. As Noam appears to have sacrificed a career in order to look after the children, Maia will need to compensate him for all the years of lost earning.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Callum and Lucy were married for five years. Callum is a rich man with investments and properties worth over £50 million. Following highly contested court proceedings Callum was ordered to pay Lucy a lump sum of £1 million. Callum has told Lucy that he would rather go to jail than comply with the court order and she can "sing for her money" as she will never get it. Lucy wants to know what her options are regarding enforcement. Which of the following options is the most likely to be effective?
She can make an application for Callum to be committed to prison for contempt of court until he pays.
correct
incorrect
She can apply to court for an enforcement order and ask for an attachment of earnings order.
correct
incorrect
She can apply to court for a charging order on one of his properties.
correct
incorrect
She can make an application to court for a warrant for the bailiffs to seize some of his possessions.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Exit Quiz
Next Question
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Reset
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country