Web Box 10.4 Clinical Applications: Alcoholics Anonymous

Alcoholics Anonymous (AA) is an organization established in 1935 and found in over 180 countries around the world with an estimated 2 million members who, as the name suggests, remain anonymous outside the AA community. It is among the best-known AUD treatment programs and is run not by treatment professionals, but by the individuals with AUD themselves, who believe they have a special understanding of the problem and can help others to become sober. Each group meets once or twice a week and several members may informally share their personal experience with alcohol abuse, describe how AA has helped them, and describe ways they deal with the struggles of staying abstinent. In these “open meetings” family and friends are permitted to attend, and the goal is to reaffirm the speakers’ sobriety and provide support and encouragement to help others to recover from AUD. In “closed meetings,” only those with AUD are permitted to attend. At these meetings, help with personal problems in daily living that are making sobriety difficult can be sought from other members. The emphasis is not on the long term but instead abstaining from alcohol one day at a time. Additionally, the “12 Steps” program may be utilized to enhance spiritual growth and emotional development. These 12 steps are as follows:

The Twelve Steps of Alcoholics Anonymous

  1. We admitted we were powerless over alcohol—that our lives had become unmanageable.
  2. Came to believe that a Power greater than ourselves could restore us to sanity.
  3. Made a decision to turn our will and our lives over to the care of God as we understood Him.
  4. Made a searching and fearless moral inventory of ourselves.
  5. Admitted to God, to ourselves and to another human being the exact nature of our wrongs.
  6. Were entirely ready to have God remove all these deficits of character.
  7. Humbly asked Him to remove our shortcomings.
  8. Made a list of all persons we had harmed, and became willing to make amends to them all.
  9. Made direct amends to such people wherever possible, except when to do so would injure them or others.
  10. Continued to take personal inventory and when we were wrong promptly admitted it.
  11. Sought through prayer and meditation to improve our conscious contact with God, as we understood Him, praying only for knowledge of His will for us and the power to carry that out.
  12. Having had a spiritual awakening as the result of these steps, we tried to carry this message to alcoholics, and to practice these principles in all our affairs.

(Source: http://www.aa.org/en_pdfs/smf-121_en.pdf)

AA groups are self-governed, and each one develops its own style of meeting. The group is self-supporting through members’ own voluntary contributions and it gets no outside financial help. Further, AA is not affiliated with any religious, medical, or psychiatric organization and has no rules beyond an individual’s sincere desire to maintain sobriety.

The self-help style of AA is not appealing to everyone. Many object to the spiritual/religious tone and some have considered AA to be a quasi-religious organization. Others object to the group approach for a personal problem. Some erroneously believe that AA forbids the use of any medication as part of the therapeutic process, but the official position of AA is that the members’ physicians should make the decision regarding use of medications. Dropout rate from the program is high. Summarizing survey data collected between 1977 and 1989, the parent group AA World Services reported that over 30% drop out after 1 month, more than 50% leave by the end of the third month, and only 25% remain in the program after 1 year. (Source: https://www.scribd.com/doc/3264243/Comments-on-A-A-s-Triennial-Surveys.)

In part because of the high dropout rate and other variables, the evaluation of program effectiveness produces highly divergent results. Reviewing the literature, Kaskutas (2009) found that abstinence rates at 1 year and 18 months for individuals attending AA are about twice as high (40% to 45%) as those not attending (Figure 1) and greater involvement in the program was associated with higher levels of abstinence in a dose-dependent–like fashion (Figure 2). In an effort to improve abstinence rates, researchers tested “intensive referral-to-self-help” compared to normal referral techniques. Intensive referral included linking patients to 12-step volunteers and encouraging the use of 12-step journals. This was associated with better attendance and greater involvement with the group (e.g., reading 12-step literature, doing service at meetings, and gaining self-identify as a self-help-group member) as well as higher abstinence rates of 51% after 1 year compared to the more typical 41% following standard referrals (Timko and DeBenedetti, 2007). However, in other studies, when compared with cognitive behavioral therapy, no difference in abstinence was seen, although the cost of mental health care was clearly lower for those attending AA. In one of the few experiments conducted that randomly assigned individuals with AUD to one of three treatment styles, those assigned to inpatient hospital care showed twice the abstinence rate (35%) after 2 years compared to AA or a “choice-of-treatment” group (Figure 3).

A bar graph depicts the plotted data for the abstinent in percent. The horizontal axis represents two categories as A A 12-step and No A A, and the vertical axis represents the percent abstinent ranging between 0 and 35. The approximated data inferred from the graph in the order of one year of abstinent and 18 months of abstinent are as follows. A A 12-step: 45 and 44; No A A: 24 and 23.

Figure 1 Abstinence rates at 1 year and 18 months for male inpatients at a Veterans Administration Hospital attending AA and those not attending. At 1 year there were 3018 subjects; at 18 months there were 91. (After Kaskutas, 2009.)

A bar graph depicts the plotted data of the abstinent percent for the corresponding meeting months. The horizontal axis represents the number of meeting months ranging between 0 and 50 plus. The vertical axis represents the percent abstinent ranging between 0 and 70. The approximated data inferred from the graph is as follows: 0: 20; 1 to 19: 32; 20 to 49: 54; and 50 plus: 62.

Figure 2 Dose–response of number of AA meetings attended during months 9 through 12 and percent abstinent during the same period. Results are based on 2376 male Veterans Administration residential patients. (After Kaskutas, 2009.)

A bar graph depicts the plotted data for the percent abstinent at two years. The horizontal axis represents three categories of hospital inpatient, AA meetings, and choice. The vertical axis represents the percent abstinent at two years, ranging between 0 and 40. The approximated data inferred from the graph is as follows. Hospital inpatient: 37; A A meetings: 14; Choice: 15.

Figure 3 Individuals with AUD treated as hospital inpatients (n = 73) were twice as likely to be abstinent at 2 years than those attending AA (n = 83) or having a choice of treatment (n = 71). (After Kaskutas, 2009.)

References

Kaskutas, L. A. (2009). Alcoholics Anonymous effectiveness: Faith meets science. J. Addict. Dis., 28(2), 145–157.

Timko, C., and DeBenedetti, A. (2007). A randomized controlled trial of intensive referral to 12-step self-help groups: One-year outcomes. Drug Alcohol Depend., 90, 270–279.

Back to top