Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Contract Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 10e student resources
Chapter 11 Self-test questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
In his speech in
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd
v
.
West Bromwich Building Society
[1998] 1 WLR 896, Lord Hoffmann alluded to a 'fundamental change' that had taken place in contract law. What 'fundamental change' was he referring to?
A rise in the number of cases raising issues of interpretation
correct
incorrect
A move from a 'literalist to a purposive approach' to statutory interpretation
correct
incorrect
A move towards an approach based on the adoption of the 'natural and ordinary meaning of the words'
correct
incorrect
To assimilate the way in which contractual documents are interpreted to the common sense principles by which any serious utterance would be interpreted in ordinary life.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following best describes what Lord Hoffmann intended when he referred to the 'matrix of fact' in his restatement of the principles of contract interpretation in
Investors Compensation Scheme Ltd
v
.
West Bromwich Building Society
[1998] 1 WLR 896?
Absolutely any evidence which might have affected the way in which the document would have been understood by a reasonable man
correct
incorrect
All evidence of the factual context in which the contract was made, but not the state of the law
correct
incorrect
Any evidence which the reasonable man would have thought relevant to his understanding of the meaning of the document
correct
incorrect
All limits on the evidence usually admissible for the purposes of contract interpretation should be lifted
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Is the following statement true or false? Pre-contractual negotiations are generally inadmissible in evidence when seeking to interpret a contract.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In those cases in which the courts take commercial common sense into account when interpreting a contract, at what point in time are they required to invoke commercial common sense?
At the time of the hearing before the court
correct
incorrect
At the time of the alleged breach of contract
correct
incorrect
At the time of entry into the contract
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country