Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Register or Log In
Register or Log In
Disciplines
Disciplines
Accounting
arrow_forward
Anthropology
arrow_forward
Art and Architecture
arrow_forward
Biology and Life Sciences
arrow_forward
Business/Marketing
arrow_forward
Chemistry
arrow_forward
Classical Studies
arrow_forward
Communication, Media Studies, & Journalism
arrow_forward
Criminal Justice/Criminology
arrow_forward
Earth and Environmental Science
arrow_forward
Economics
arrow_forward
Education
arrow_forward
Engineering
arrow_forward
English
arrow_forward
Finance
arrow_forward
Geography
arrow_forward
Health Sciences and Nursing
arrow_forward
History
arrow_forward
Law
arrow_forward
Music
arrow_forward
Neuroscience
arrow_forward
Philosophy
arrow_forward
Physics
arrow_forward
Political Science/Politics
arrow_forward
Psychology
arrow_forward
Religion
arrow_forward
Social Work
arrow_forward
Sociology
arrow_forward
Women's, Gender & Sexuality Studies
arrow_forward
Instructors
Students
Integration
Contact Us
Return to Complete Criminal Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 8e Student Resources
Chapter 5 Multiple choice questions
*
not completed
.
The unlawful act in manslaughter consists of which of the following:
Either a criminal or a civil wrong.
correct
incorrect
Either an act or an omission.
correct
incorrect
A crime by an intentional positive act.
correct
incorrect
A crime which does not need to be specifically proved or identified in the proceedings provided the unlawful act caused death.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
D aged 14 throws a brick at a young man (V) playing cricket with his son in a park. The brick causes minor injury. Twenty minutes later, V collapses and dies from a heart attack due to physical shock. How should the judge direct the jury on unlawful and dangerous act manslaughter?
The assault caused the death therefore D is guilty.
correct
incorrect
The question of danger is to be assessed according to D's belief.
correct
incorrect
All D needs to do is to commit an intentional offence which causes shock.
correct
incorrect
D must commit an intentional unlawful act constituting a crime which (1) must objectively carry the risk of some harm and (2) must be the cause of death.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
D supplies a class A drug to V, prepares a syringe, and hands it to V for immediate injection. V injects himself. Which of the following correctly states the law?
D has committed two unlawful acts: possession of a Class A drug and administration of it under s23 OAPA 1861 both of which are inherently dangerous. He is therefore guilty of unlawful act manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
V's self-injection is foreseeable and does not therefore break the chain of causation. D is guilty of manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
Both D and V were accomplices in an unlawful enterprise and therefore D is guilty of manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
D did not commit an unlawful act under s23 because he did not administer the drug or cause it to be administered or taken by V. D is not guilty of unlawful act manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The ratio of Tesco Supermarkets Ltd v Nattrass [1972] is as follows:
The company was guilty of a consumer offence through the delegation principle
correct
incorrect
The company was not guilty because it had exercised due diligence
correct
incorrect
The company was guilty by virtue of vicarious liability
correct
incorrect
The company was not guilty because the offence was committed by an employee and not by a senior officer who could be identified with the company
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Vicarious liability means:
That an employer will be criminally liable for all the unlawful acts of an employee
correct
incorrect
That under the delegation principle an employer will be liable for offences of SL
correct
incorrect
That under the attribution principle an employer will be liable for offences of MR and negligence
correct
incorrect
That an employer can be liable for offences committed by an employee in the course of employment where responsibility has been delegated (MR offences) or where the act of the employee can be attributed to the employer (SL offences.)
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The P & O Ferries case decided the following:
The company was not guilty because it was impossible for a company to be convicted of manslaughter
correct
incorrect
The company was guilty under the aggregation principle
correct
incorrect
The company was not guilty because it had not been grossly negligent
correct
incorrect
The company was not guilty by virtue of the identification principle and the Caldwell test which applied to manslaughter at that time
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The Corporate Manslaughter & Corporate Homicide Act 2007 provides the following:
Corporate manslaughter will be committed where death was caused by activities managed or organised amounting to a gross breach of a relevant duty of care
correct
incorrect
The activity does not need to be managed or organized by a senior manager
correct
incorrect
A relevant duty will be breached if there is organisational neglect
correct
incorrect
In deciding whether a duty has been breached, organizational policy or company culture will be ignored
correct
incorrect
Exit Quiz
Next Question
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Reset
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2022
Select your Country
×