Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Public Law: Text, Cases, and Materials 5e Student Resources
Chapter 19 Self-test questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Even those who argue that the purpose of judicial review is to serve parliamentary intentions agree that judicial review is an inherent jurisdiction emanating from the common law.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Judicial review is a common law jurisdiction. This means that the existence of judicial review as well as rights of appeal do not depend on whether or not Parliament thinks these should be recognised.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The House of Lords case
Anisminic v Foreign Compensation Commission
[1969] 2 AC 147 establishes that Parliament cannot exclude judicial review.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Per
Cart
[2011] UKSC 28, non-appealable decisions of the Upper Tribunal are amenable to judicial review.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements best describes the view Lord Carnwath in
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
[2019] UKSC 22?
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal essentially exercises a power of judicial review which would otherwise be exercised by the High Court.
correct
incorrect
The Investigatory Powers Tribunal is a specialist tribunal, and therefore is better equipped to handle particular complaints, rendering judicial review unnecessary.
correct
incorrect
If Parliament wished to exclude judicial review, they should do so with the most clear and explicit words, and it is not for the Court to stretch the words used beyond their natural meaning.
correct
incorrect
Due to concerns about national security, it is understandable that judicial review is excluded as it would require sensitive information to be heard in public.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Lord Carnwath in
R (Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal
[2019] UKSC 22 stated that the judiciary should have the final say on the extent to which a statutory clause which purports wholly to exclude the supervisory jurisdiction of the courts should be upheld.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What does Young say about the Calling and Dissolution of Parliament Act 2022 which contains provisions that are intended to prevent judicial review of decisions to dissolve and call a new Parliament? Please select all that apply.
As in
Privacy International
, the court may find that the wording of the provision is not clear enough to remove exclude judicial review.
correct
incorrect
The court may find that the provision excludes jurisdictional errors of fact but not those of law.
correct
incorrect
The courts are likely to interpret this provision narrowly since they are subject to the principle of legality which includes the rule of law.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Executive entrapment of judicial review only works if the government ends up winning its case in court such that its decision or policy is not struck down as unlawful.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following are aims of judicial review? Please select all that apply.
Holding the government to account.
correct
incorrect
Preventing government from running smoothly.
correct
incorrect
Providing just results in individual cases.
correct
incorrect
Improving the quality of public administration.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Local authorities tend not to implement judicial review decisions.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country