Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Land Law: Directions 8e Resources
Chapter 12 Scenario questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Majin is the owner of the piece of land called Purpleinch, and his neighbour, Alexis, owns another plot of land closer to the main road. As Majin's land does not come into contact with the main road, he has a right to travel over Alexis' land to get to the main road. What position will Majin and his piece of land occupy in regard the requirements of an easement set out in
Regency Villas Title Ltd and Others v. Diamond Resorts (Europe) Ltd and Another
[2018] UKSC 57? Select all that apply.
Dominant Owner
correct
incorrect
Servient Tenement
correct
incorrect
Servient Owner
correct
incorrect
Dominant Tenement
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Chaim, Majin's friend, owns a field 2 miles away from Purleinch. He is regularly at Majin's house, and drives to get there. However, Majin does not have a lot of carparking spaces available, and so Chain would like to know if he could acquire and easement of parking over Alexis' land in favour of his nearby field. Moreover, Majin would also like to know if it would be theoretically possible to acquire an easement in favour of Purpleinch to put up a large plaque identifying the location of Purpleinch. Do Majin and Chain's potential easement accommodate a dominant tenement?
Only Majin's potential easement accommodates the dominant tenement
correct
incorrect
Only Chaim's potential easement accommodates the dominant tenement
correct
incorrect
Both of the potential easements accommodate the dominant tenement
correct
incorrect
Neither of the potential easements accommodate the dominant tenement
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Enuma owns a 34
th
floor flat in Canary Wharf. She likes her view, and does not wish for it to change. She therefore wants to create an easement with her neighbours preventing any changes to the view. She also wishes to acquire an easement to make a lot of noise at 3am, as she is planning on turning her flat into a boutique nightclub. Do either of these potential easements have certainty of description?
Neither of the easements have certainty of description
correct
incorrect
Only the easement to make noise at 3am will have certainty of description
correct
incorrect
Both of the easements have certainty of description
correct
incorrect
Only the easement preserving the view will have certainty of description
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Catriona owns two plots of land far from the main road, and has a right of way over her neighbour's land to get to the first of the plots. The easement itself states that Catriona can use the right 'for all reasonable purposes connected with the occupation of the land'. The first plot (plot 1) is the larger of the plots and there is 4 storey house, but has little room for parking. Catriona therefore wishes to use the smaller plot (plot 2) as parking, and to get to this land she must go through a small slither of land on plot 1. Can Catriona use her right of way to get to plot 2 and park her car?
No, because of the rule in
Harris v Flower
correct
incorrect
No, because it is exercising a different right
correct
incorrect
Yes, as the car parking is ancillary to her right of way
correct
incorrect
Yes, because parking is a universal right
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Clementina has just bought a piece of land in the Northumbrian countryside. There is a well-worn path that runs over a neighbour's land and leads to the land from the nearest road, and this is how she visited the land when she was viewing it. There is a substantial river that flows through the land purchased, and it is easily navigable. Upon rechecking the conveyancing documents, Clementina has confirmed that there is no document granting a right of way over the path to the purchased plot of land, but that the previous owner had used it for the last 7 years. By what means could Clementina acquire an easement of right of way over the path?
Implied grant of necessity
correct
incorrect
The rule in
Wheeldon v Burrows
correct
incorrect
Prescription through lost modern grant
correct
incorrect
Express grant
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country