Duty of care: basic principles

On Caparo v Dickman [1990]

A good note here on a recent application of the Caparo test for a novel situation (no duty owed): https://nigelpooleqc.blogspot.co.uk/2016/04/who-is-my-neighbour.html

On Siddiqui v University of Oxford [2016] EWHC 3150

‘Judge allows Oxford graduate's £1m high court battle to proceed’, The Guardian, 5 December 2016

Burgess and another v Lejonvarn [2016] EWHC 40 (TCC) a cautionary tale for professional consultants offering friendly advice, the Technology and Construction Court found that an architect owed a duty of care in tort when advising friends on a garden project: http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2016/40.html


Caparo Industries v Dickman [1990]

Back to top