Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Learning Legal Rules 11e Student Resources
Chapter 5 Self-test questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
'Case law' is the term used by common lawyers to describe the collection of legal principles emanating from all of the reported cases on a given topic.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What does the Latin phrase
stare decisis
literally translate as?
Let the decision stay.
correct
incorrect
Stay decided.
correct
incorrect
The ratio is decisive.
correct
incorrect
Let the decision stand.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In practice, the principle of
stare decisis
means that all courts of equal or lower status to the court making the decision will be bound by that decision if the two cases are similar.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Case 1: A man is walking his dog in the park. The dog bites a passing toddler, who has done nothing to provoke the dog. The man is held liable in negligence.
Case 2: A woman's cat bites a teenager who was pulling its tail.
Which of the following would the judge in case 2 need to consider in deciding whether case 1 should be applied (select all that apply)?
Whether the principle of liability is applicable to dogs only or can include cats.
correct
incorrect
Whether the fact that it was a toddler who was bitten gave rise to liability in case 1 and so excludes cases relating to teenagers.
correct
incorrect
Whether it is significant that the attack on the toddler was unprovoked because the attack on the teenager was provoked.
correct
incorrect
There is no cat in case 1 and these breeds are irrelevant both to establishing liability in case 1 and to the question of whether this should be applied to case 2.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following statements is illustrated by the reasoning of the Court of Appeal in
Household Fire Insurance Co v Grant
?
Precedent is fixed so judges cannot decide to interpret it individually.
correct
incorrect
Judges may use the same authority to come to different conclusions.
correct
incorrect
Judges using the same authority must come to the same conclusion.
correct
incorrect
The Court of Appeal was not bound by
Dunlop v Higgins
because it was decided by a lower court.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following are
not
persuasive precedents?
Decisions of the Scottish and Northern Irish courts.
correct
incorrect
Decisions of courts of lower status.
correct
incorrect
A decision of the Court of Appeal (when considered by the High Court
correct
incorrect
Decisions of the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Decisions of the House of Lords/Supreme Court are binding upon all courts including the Supreme Court itself.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following would
not
be sufficient reason to date for the Supreme Court to overturn its own previous decision?
The outcome was wrong but the reasoning was correct.
correct
incorrect
Public policy suggests that the decision should be overturned.
correct
incorrect
The earlier decision was wrong.
correct
incorrect
The review would affect the resolution of the actual case.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Retrospective overruling means that the ruling catches the parties to the case, and any other cases coming before the court, even if events occurred before the decision was given. Prospective overruling means that only events occurring after the ruling are caught by it.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Complete the following (select all that apply):
per incuriam
was a rule invented by Lord Denning and died with him.
correct
incorrect
cannot be used by the Court of Appeal as a reason not to follow a previous House of Lords/Supreme Court decision.
correct
incorrect
is a rule that allows the Court of Appeal not to follow a previous House of Lords/Supreme Court decision.
correct
incorrect
means that a court failed to consider all the relevant and vital statutes or case authorities and this had a major effect on its decision.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The latin maxim
cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex
means 'with the reason for the rule ceasing, the law itself no longer exists'.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
When can the Court of Appeal decide not to follow a decision made by the House of Lords/Supreme Court?
When the rules set out by the 1966
Practice Statement
apply.
correct
incorrect
Never.
correct
incorrect
When
cessante ratione legis, cessat ipsa lex
.
correct
incorrect
When the House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision was made
per incuriam
.
correct
incorrect
When the House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision is clearly wrong, and both the reasoning and the decision should be departed from.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
When is the Court of Appeal
not
bound by its own previous decisions (select all that apply)?
When the previous decision has been made
per incuriam
.
correct
incorrect
When the House of Lords/Supreme Court has expressly or impliedly overruled the Court of Appeal's reasoning.
correct
incorrect
When there are two conflicting Court of Appeal decisions.
correct
incorrect
When the Court of Appeal has expressly chosen not to follow an earlier House of Lords'/Supreme Court decision.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What was significant about the case of
R v Faqir Mohammed
?
The House of Lords decided that
Smith
was the correct authority rather than the JCPC's decision in
Jersey v Holley
.
correct
incorrect
In this case, the Court of Appeal decided to follow the JCPC's decision in
Jersey v Holley
instead of the House of Lords decision in
Smith
, overcoming the strict rules of
stare decisis
.
correct
incorrect
In this case, the JCPC overruled the previous House of Lords decision in
Smith
.
correct
incorrect
The Court of Appeal decided not to follow its own previous decision in
Jersey v Holley
.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The 'leapfrogging' procedure is where criminal cases go on appeal from the High Court directly to the House of Lords.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2025
Select your Country