Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Capital Punishment: Theory and Practice of the Ultimate 1e Student Resources
Chapter 4 Test Questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
The issue in
Atkins v Virginia
was in regards to:
The age of the defendant
correct
incorrect
The intelligence of the defendant
correct
incorrect
The race of the defendant
correct
incorrect
The race of the victim
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
This was of great importance in the
Atkins v. Virginia
decision:
The evolving standards of decency
correct
incorrect
The age of the defendant
correct
incorrect
The race of the victim
correct
incorrect
The race of the defendant
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
This was the Amendment at issue in
Ring v. Arizona
:
8th
correct
incorrect
14th
correct
incorrect
6th
correct
incorrect
2nd
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The Supreme Court ruling in
Ring v. Arizona
was:
Only the judge makes the decision on sentencing a defendant to death
correct
incorrect
Only the jury makes the decision on sentencing a defendant to death
correct
incorrect
Both the judge and jury make the decision on sentencing a defendant to death
correct
incorrect
Neither the judge nor the jury make the decision on sentencing a defendant to death
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The Supreme Court ruling in
Ring v. Arizona
did the following:
Diminished the power of judicial discretion in capital cases
correct
incorrect
Diminished the power of the juries in capital cases
correct
incorrect
Diminished the power of both judges and juries in capital cases
correct
incorrect
Diminished the rights of the defendants
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The difference between
Ring v. Arizona
and
Walton
v. Arizona
is:
Ring
gave trial judges complete sentencing authority in capital cases
correct
incorrect
Walton
gave trial judges complete sentencing authority in capital cases
correct
incorrect
Walton
gave the jury complete sentencing authority in capital cases
correct
incorrect
There was no difference in sentencing authority in capital cases
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
In
Roper v. Simmons
, the Courts ruled that:
Intellectually challenged offenders cannot receive the death penalty
correct
incorrect
Convicted rapists cannot receive the death penalty
correct
incorrect
Murder for monetary gain can be punishable by the death penalty
correct
incorrect
Offenders under the age of 18 cannot receive the death penalty
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
One of the differences between juvenile and adult offenders is:
Juveniles suffer from identity crises
correct
incorrect
Juveniles are less reckless than adults
correct
incorrect
Juveniles don't understand how heinous murder is
correct
incorrect
Adults suffer from identity crises
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Another difference between juvenile and adult offenders is:
Adults know what they are doing when they commit murder
correct
incorrect
Juveniles are impressionable and susceptible to peer pressure
correct
incorrect
Juveniles have a hard time differentiating between right and wrong
correct
incorrect
None of the above
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The defendants' argument in
Baze and Bowling v. Reez
was essentially:
Juveniles should not be executed
correct
incorrect
Intellectually challenged offenders should not be executed
correct
incorrect
An accomplice who is not aware a victim will be murdered should not be executed
correct
incorrect
Death by lethal injection is cruel and unusual punishment
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country