Chapter 11 Further reading

Bridge, C., ‘Adoption and Contact: The Value of Openness’ [1994] Journal of Child Law 147

Bridge, C., ‘Adoption Law: A Balance of Interests’ in J. Herring (ed), Family law: Issues, Debates, Policy (Cullompton: Willan, 2001)

Bridge, C. and Swindells, H., Adoption: The Modern Law (Bristol: Family Law, 2003)

Casey, D. and Gibberd, A., ‘Adoption and Contact’ [2000] Family Law 39

Curry-Sumner, I., ‘EB v France: A Missed Opportunity?’ [2009] Child and Family Law Quarterly 356

Dey, I., ‘Adapting Adoption: A Case of Closet Politics?’ (2005) 19(3) International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 289

Doughty, J., ‘Myths and Misunderstanding in Adoption Law and Policy’ [2015] CFLQ 331.

Eekelaar, J., ‘Contact and the Adoption Reform’ in A. Bainham, B. Lindley, M. Richards, and L. Trinder (eds), Children and Their Families: Contact, Rights and Welfare (Oxford: Hart, 2003), pp 253–74

Hall, A., ‘Special Guardianship and Permanency Planning: Unforeseen Consequences and Missed Opportunities’ [2008] Child and Family Law Quarterly 359

Hall, A., ‘Special Guardianship—Themes Emerging from Case-Law’ [2008] Family Law 244

Harris-Short, S., ‘Holding onto the Past? Adoption, Birth Parents and the Law in the Twenty-First Century’ in R. Probert and C. Barton (eds) Fifty Years in Family Law: Essays for Stephen Cretney (Cambridge: Intersentia, 2012), p 147.

Hitchings, E. and Sagar, T., ‘The Adoption and Children Act 2002: A Level Playing Field for Same-Sex Adopters?’ [2002] Child and Family Law Quarterly 60

Hughes, K. and Sloan, B., ‘Post-Adoption Photographs: Welfare, Rights and Judicial Reasoning’ [2011] Child and Family Law Quarterly 393

Jordan, L. and Lindley, B. (eds), Special Guardianship: What Does it Offer Children Who Cannot Live with Their Parents? (London: Family Rights Group, 2006)

Lewis, J., ‘Adoption: The Nature of Policy Shifts in England and Wales, 1972–2002’ (2004) 18(2) International Journal of Law, Policy and the Family 235

Lowe, N. V., ‘English Adoption Law: Past, Present and Future’ in S. Katz, J. Eekelaar, and M. Maclean (eds), Cross-Currents: Family Law and Policy in the US and England (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000), pp 307–40

Masson, J., ‘Disruptive judgments’ [2017] CFLQ 401

Sloan, B., ‘Re C (A Child) (Adoption: Duty of Local Authority)—Welfare and the Rights of the Birth Family in “Fast Track” Adoption Cases’ [2009] Child and Family Law Quarterly 87

Sloan, B. ‘Adoption Decisions in England: Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Appeal) and Beyond’ (2015) 37(4) Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law 437–57.

Sloan, B., ‘Post-Adoption Contact Reform: Compounding the State-Ordered Termination of Parenthood? (2014) 73(2) Cambridge Law Journal 378–404

Smith, C. and Logan, J., ‘Adoptive Parenthood as a “Legal Fiction”—Its Consequences for Direct Post-Adoption Contact’ [2002] Child and Family Law Quarterly 281