Chapter 13 Further reading

Adoption
  • Fenton- Glynn, C. (2017). ‘Re C v XYZ County Council’, in H. Stalford, K. Hollingsworth, and S. Gilmore (eds), Rewriting Children’s Rights Judgments: From Academic Vision to New Practice (Oxford: Hart Publishing).
  • Hughes, K. and Sloan, B. (2011). ‘Post-Adoption Photographs: Welfare, Rights and Judicial Reasoning’. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 23: 393. 
  • Harris-Short, S. (2001). ‘The Adoption and Children Bill – a fast track to failure?’, Child and Family Law Quarterly 13: 405
  • Hayes, P. (2003). ‘Giving due consideration to ethnicity in adoption placements – a principled approach’, Child and Family Law Quarterly 15: 225.
  • Lowe, N. (1997). ‘The changing face of adoption – the gift/donation model versus the contract/services model’, Child and Family Law Quarterly 9: 371.
  • Luckock, B. and Hart, A. (2005). ‘Adoptive family life and adoption support: policy ambivalence and the development of effective services’, Child and Family Social Work 10: 125.  
  • Narey, M. (2011). The Narey Report: A blueprint for the nation’s lost children.The Times, July 5th 2011.
  •  Selwyn, J., Meakings, S. and Wijedasa, D. (2014)  Beyond the Adoption Order: Challenges, Interventions and Adoption Disruption (London: Department for Education)
  • Smith, C. (2004). ‘Autopoietic Law and the ‘Epistemic Trap’: A Case Study of Adoption and Contact’, Journal of Law and Society 31; 318.
  • Sloan, B. (2013). ‘Conflicting rights: English adoption law and the implementation of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child’. Child and Family Law Quarterly, 25: 40.
  • Sloan, B. (2015). ‘Adoption Decisions in England: Re B (A Child) (Care Proceedings: Appeal) and Beyond’. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, 37: 437
Back to top