Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Public Law Directions 2e Resources
Chapter 6 Multiple-choice questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Parliamentary sovereignty derives from:
statute.
correct
incorrect
judicial recognition of Parliament as having legislative supremacy.
correct
incorrect
the Royal Prerogative.
correct
incorrect
a codified constitution.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Legislative supremacy conveys the idea that: Please select all that apply.
Parliament's law-making power is restricted.
correct
incorrect
Parliament has unlimited authority to make law which no one can override.
correct
incorrect
All statutes are repealable.
correct
incorrect
Entrenchment of Acts of Parliament passed by a previous Parliament is legally impossible.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which theorist argued that legal sovereignty means that each parliament has 'for the time being power to make laws of any kind in the manner required by the law'?
Sir Edward Coke
correct
incorrect
Blackstone
correct
incorrect
Sir Ivor Jennings
correct
incorrect
A.V. Dicey
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the statements below is correct? Please select all that apply.
The courts cannot question the validity of an Act that has passed through the correct legislative process and received royal assent.
correct
incorrect
The courts can question the validity of an Act of Parliament in some circumstances.
correct
incorrect
The courts cannot hold any Act of Parliament to be
ultra vires
.
correct
incorrect
The duty of the court is to obey and apply an Act of Parliament.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The European Communities Act 1972 is not repealable and is entrenched.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Laws LJ in
Thoburn
v Sunderland City Council
[2002] EWHC 195 (Admin) stated that Parliament cannot bind its successors by stipulating against repeal.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which statement does
not
accurately describe arguments and reasoning in
Jackson v Attorney General
?
The claimants argued that the Hunting Act 2004 was not valid because the Parliament Act 1949 was not valid.
correct
incorrect
The claimants argued that the 1949 Act had been passed by invoking the Parliament Act 1911, so had altered the powers of the House of Lords without its assent.
correct
incorrect
The court held that the Parliament Act 1911 could not redefine the powers of Parliament so could not apply to future Parliaments.
correct
incorrect
The court held that the Parliament Act 1949 had been validly passed, and the Hunting Act 2004 was valid.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The result of a referendum is legally binding on Parliament.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Exit Quiz
Next Question
Review all Questions
Submit Quiz
Reset
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country