A ban on all convicted, serving prisoners from voting in general elections was too indiscriminate in its effects and not adequately justified, and so, in principle, violated Article 3.
A ban on any member of a foreign legislature from also being a member of the national legislature was upheld as a reasonable qualification on the right to sit.
The right to vote etc is so important that there needs to be an effective and independent, legally based, process for dealing with complaints about electoral rights. States have a wide margin of appreciation on this but the Court will intervene if the national system fails to provide proper independence by, for example, leaving it to Parliament.
Political restrictions imposed on local government workers, which prevented them from standing in elections, were justified and reasonable restrictions aimed at maintaining the impartiality of the public services.
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024