Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to JC Smith's The Law of Contract, 3e Student Resources
Chapter 9 Self-test questions
Contracts requiring writing
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
To which type of agreement does the Statute of Frauds 1677 apply?
Indemnities (unconditional promises).
correct
incorrect
Guarantees (conditional promises).
correct
incorrect
The Statute applies to both (a) and (b).
correct
incorrect
None of the above.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What type of communication will satisfy the requirement for a signature in section 4 of the Statute of Frauds 1677?
An email signed off with a person's first name.
correct
incorrect
A manual signature.
correct
incorrect
The manual insertion of an email address.
correct
incorrect
All the above.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
What is the effect of non-compliance with the Statute of Frauds 1677?
The contract is rendered void.
correct
incorrect
The contract is rendered voidable.
correct
incorrect
The contract is unenforceable.
correct
incorrect
The contract is valid and enforceable.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Does section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 apply to contracts which effect a sale or disposition of an interest in land?
Yes.
correct
incorrect
No.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following types of agreement are covered by section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989?
A 'lock-out' agreement.
correct
incorrect
The payment of a 'finder's fee' regarding the sale of property.
correct
incorrect
A contract providing the option to purchase land.
correct
incorrect
All of the above are covered by section 2 of the Act.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
How does section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 differ from section 4 of the Statute of Frauds 1677?
The 1989 Act requires the contract to be
made
in writing, not
evidenced
in writing.
correct
incorrect
The 1989 Act requires the contract to be
evidenced
in writing, not necessarily
made
in writing.
correct
incorrect
The 1989 Act does not cover transfers of legal title to property.
correct
incorrect
The 1989 and 1677 Acts do not differ.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
May a party invoke promissory estoppel to circumvent the operation of section 4 of the Statute of Frauds 1677?
Yes, always.
correct
incorrect
Yes, where it would be inequitable to deny the claim.
correct
incorrect
Yes, if there was an oral promise on which the other party replied,
correct
incorrect
No.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
How may section 4 of the Statute of Frauds 1677 be complied with where a contract was formed orally?
The parties may orally waive the application of the Statute.
correct
incorrect
The parties may support their oral promise with a written note or memorandum.
correct
incorrect
The parties may apply to the court to have the Statute waived.
correct
incorrect
The parties will be unable to comply with the Statute, and the oral contract will be unenforceable.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Does section 2 of the Law of Property (Miscellaneous Provisions) Act 1989 preclude claims in proprietary estoppel?
Yes.
correct
incorrect
No.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country