Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Subject Area Student Resources for Criminal Law
Self-test questions: Property offences
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Alex and Zavier are law students and are discussing what can be stolen and what cannot under the Theft Act 1968, section 4. Which one of the following on their list cannot be stolen?
Land and things annexed to the land
correct
incorrect
Wild animals in a wildlife park or zoo
correct
incorrect
A haircut and blow dry
correct
incorrect
A debt or a similar thing in action
correct
incorrect
Wild mushrooms to be sold at the local farmers' market
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Bertha is wondering in what sort of reasons can be used as a defence to a charge of theft. From the list below, which is not necessarily a defence to a charge of theft, even if clearly established?
Insanity
correct
incorrect
A belief in a legal right to appropriate the property
correct
incorrect
A belief that the property has been abandoned and that nobody else has any right or interest in it.
correct
incorrect
A willingness to pay whatever the property is worth
correct
incorrect
A belief that the owner would consent if they knew of the appropriation and the circumstances of it.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Nadia is a Greek holiday maker in London. She takes a taxi from the Tower of London, after sight seeing, to her hotel. Upon arrival at the hotel, the taxi driver, Fred asks for the fare. Nadia does not understand and she holds out her purse to indicate that Fred can take the fare she owes him. Fred takes £100 more than the cost of the fare from Nadia's purse.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the relevant principle on theft?
Fred was not dishonest as he knew he had a legal right to the fare, and thought he would take advantage of Nadia by taking the additional £100, knowing other people would not approve.
correct
incorrect
Fred was not dishonest as he believed he had the owner's consent to take the fare, and thought he would take advantage of Nadia by taking the additional £100, knowing other people would not approve.
correct
incorrect
Fred has not appropriated anything as he had Nadia's consent to take the money from her purse.
correct
incorrect
Fred has only appropriated the additional £100 as he has assumed a right of the owner, regardless of the fact Nadia gave her consent to take the money from her purse
correct
incorrect
Fred has appropriated the fare and the additional £100 as he has assumed a right of the owner, regardless of the fact Nadia gave her consent to take the money from her purse
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Jerry borrows Scott's football season ticket to go to a match that Scott cannot attend. Jerry does not see Scott for some time and uses the season ticket on a further five occasions. When he finally returns the ticket to Scott, there are no matches of the season remaining. Following the decision in
R v Lloyd
[1985], which of the following statements most accurately reflects the decision and how it applies to Jerry?
Jerry intended to permanently deprive Scott of a useful ticket by removing sufficient value from it that it amounted to the equivalent of an outright taking.
correct
incorrect
Jerry had been given the ticket by Scott and he could not be deemed to have appropriated the ticket, because he had Scott's consent.
correct
incorrect
Jerry removed some of the value of the season ticket, but as a match remained this does not amount to an intention to permanently deprive as this was not an equivalent to an outright taking.
correct
incorrect
Jerry was not dishonest because he believed Scott would have consented to him using the season ticket on the additional occasions.
correct
incorrect
Jerry was not dishonest if he paid some money to Scott as a contribution towards the season ticket.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
It was the first sunny day in a long time. Theo thought it would be a lovely idea to have a neighbourhood barbeque party, but he didn't have a barbeque. Theo saw Jason's barbeque out on his drive and thought he would borrow it for 24 hours and replace it the next day. He invited the neighbours to his party and Jason came, Jason complained that his barbeque had been taken and he was very annoyed about it. Jason discovered his barbeque the next day, after Theo had returned it during the early hours of the morning.
Which of the following statements most accurately applies to Theo and his potential liability for the offence of theft?
Theo is not liable for theft because he did not appropriate the barbeque, because he was only borrowing it.
correct
incorrect
Theo is liable for theft because the barbeque belonged to Jason.
correct
incorrect
Theo is liable for theft because he appropriated the barbeque.
correct
incorrect
Theo is not liable for theft as he believed Jason would have given him permission to borrow the barbeque.
correct
incorrect
Theo is not liable for theft as he did not intend to permanently deprive Jason of the barbeque.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Dr Ahmed wanted to conduct some anatomical experiments and needed human body parts to do so. He knew he would not receive ethical approval to obtain body parts from the hospital and removed several from the hospital that had been preserved for official medical purposes. He was eventually caught with several torsos and legs and charged with theft.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflect the legal position relating to theft as it would apply to Dr Ahmed.
Dr Ahmed has stolen property because the body parts had acquired different attributes by virtue of the application of preservation techniques.
correct
incorrect
Dr Ahmed has not stolen property as human bodies or parts of them are not classed as property under s. 4 Theft Act 1968.
correct
incorrect
Dr Ahmed has stolen property because human bodies or parts of them are considered property under s. 4 Theft Act 1968.
correct
incorrect
Dr Ahmed has not stolen property belonging to another as he used the parts for unofficial medical purposes.
correct
incorrect
Dr Ahmed has not stolen property belonging to another because all medical practitioners have a right to use body parts to advance their skill base.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Graham approaches Prue in the street and says that he will attack her tomorrow if she does not hand over her £10 now. Prue hands Graham her money.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Graham is guilty of theft and robbery
correct
incorrect
Graham is only guilty of robbery
correct
incorrect
Graham is only guilty of theft
correct
incorrect
Graham is guilty of theft and burglary
correct
incorrect
Graham is only guilty of burglary.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Harry threatens to smash William's sports car that is on his drive if William does not write his newspaper column for him whilst Harry is on holiday. William writes the column.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Harry will be guilty of theft
correct
incorrect
Harry will be guilty of robbery
correct
incorrect
Harry will be guilty of burglary
correct
incorrect
Harry will be guilty of aggravated burglary.
correct
incorrect
Harry will not be guilty of a property offence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Barrington approaches Helen and threatens to hit her in the face then and there if she does not give him her air pods. Helen, frightened, gives Barrington her air pods. The next day Barrington returns them to Helen as he always intended to do in the same condition as he took them.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Barrington is guilty of theft
correct
incorrect
Barrington is guilty of assault but not guilty of any property offence.
correct
incorrect
Barrington is guilty of theft and robbery
correct
incorrect
Barrington is guilty of robbery
correct
incorrect
Barrington is guilty of a battery but not guilty of theft.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Sinbad pulls hard on Pluto's briefcase, causing Pluto to stumble and release his hold on the briefcase. Sinbad runs away with the briefcase.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Sinbad is guilty of robbery as he applied force in order to steal.
correct
incorrect
Sinbad is only guilty of theft as he did not apply force to Pluto's person.
correct
incorrect
Sinbad is guilty of burglary as he set out to steal Pluto's briefcase.
correct
incorrect
Sinbad is guilty of battery and theft.
correct
incorrect
Sinbad is guilty of assault and theft.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Isla uses a screwdriver to break a window in Horace's flat late at night. Once successful she climbs through the window and looks for Horace's cash. Horace, who had been asleep awakes as he hears noises and sees Isla in his flat. He calls Curly, his next-door neighbour who comes to the flat and holds Isla until the police arrive. The police find that Isla was carrying the screwdriver.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Isla can be convicted of robbery
correct
incorrect
Isla can be convicted of a battery and theft.
correct
incorrect
Isla will not be convicted of aggravated burglary because she does not have a weapon of offence with her in the flat.
correct
incorrect
Isla can be convicted of aggravated burglary because the screwdriver will be deemed a weapon.
correct
incorrect
Isla will only be convicted of a battery offence under s. 9(1)(a) Theft Act 1968.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Shamali needed to use a university laptop, but she had heard that there was only a very limited number available to students. She sneaked into the I.T services staff room one day, looking for a laptop to steal. She found a laptop sitting on Eve's desk and took it.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Shamali is a trespasser as she does not have permission to be in the I.T. services staff room and therefore she is guilty of burglary s. 9(1)(b) Theft Act 1968
correct
incorrect
Shamali is not a trespasser as she does not have permission to be in the I.T. services staff room and therefore she is guilty of burglary s. 9(1)(a) Theft Act 1968
correct
incorrect
Shamali is a trespasser as she does not have permission to be in the I.T. services staff room and therefore she is guilty of burglary s. 9(1)(a) Theft Act 1968
correct
incorrect
Shamali will only be guilty of theft
correct
incorrect
Shamali will be guilty of aggravated burglary.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Bob is a drug addict and he needs money to buy drugs. He lets himself into his father's home with a key that his father gave him and takes the television, which he sells for £30.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Bob is only guilty of theft
correct
incorrect
Bob is guilty of burglary
correct
incorrect
Bob is guilty of robbery
correct
incorrect
Bob has only trespassed, contrary to civil law.
correct
incorrect
Bob is not guilty of any offence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Roger sees Simon's wallet lying on the table in the courtyard of a café and shouts at Simon to give him his wallet otherwise Roger will cut Simon's face up. Roger takes the wallet and runs away. Simon is unaware that Roger has taken his wallet as he is blind.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in relation to the law on property offences?
Roger is liable for the offence of battery and theft.
correct
incorrect
Roger is liable for the offence of burglary.
correct
incorrect
Roger is liable for the offence of robbery.
correct
incorrect
Roger is liable for the offence of theft and assault.
correct
incorrect
Roger is liable only for the offence of theft.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country