Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Subject Area Student Resources for Criminal Law
Self-test questions: Parties to crime
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Bentley planned to break into Vernon's warehouse for the purpose of stealing 200 cases of vodka that had recently been stored there. Bentley persuaded Cradock to act as his van driver and look-out. He agreed. However, they were stopped by police officers as they were trying to escape, because Cradock had not put the van lights on. They were arrested when the officers found the stolen vodka in the van.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to parties to a crime that applies here?
Bentley and Cradock would only be liable for conspiring to commit a burglary.
correct
incorrect
Bentley will be guilty of burglary as a principal offender, and Cradock will be guilty as an accomplice under s.1(1) Criminal Law Act 1977.
correct
incorrect
Bentley will be guilty of burglary as a principal offender, and Cradock will be guilty as an accomplice under s. 8 Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.
correct
incorrect
Bentley will be the only one guilty of a burglary; Cradock will not be guilty of any crime.
correct
incorrect
Bentley will be guilty of burglary as an accomplice, and Cradock will be guilty as the principal offender under s. 8 Accessories and Abettors Act 1861.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Vixon and Foxtrot envy Romeo because he is very popular with their peers. They both want Romeo to disappear, as they believe it will increase their own popularity. During a gathering of young people one evening, Vixon and Foxtrot, without prior conversation between each other, approach Romeo and an argument ensues between the three of them. Vixon and Foxtrot are both carrying knives and stab Romeo several times each. Vixon acted first. Romeo dies of his injuries.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to parties to a crime that applies here?
Vixon is a principal offender to Romeo's murder and Foxtrot is an accomplice to the murder
correct
incorrect
Vixon and Foxtrot are not guilty of murder as Romeo provoked them in an argument.
correct
incorrect
Vixon and Foxtrot are both accomplices to the murder of Romeo.
correct
incorrect
Vixon and Foxtrot are both principal offenders to the murder of Romeo.
correct
incorrect
Foxtrot is the principal offender to Romeo's murder and Vixon is an accomplice to the murder.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Fagan tells Oliver (aged 9) to take the wallet out of Hardwick's coat pocket, so as not to let Hardwick be aware of what is happening. Oliver does as he is told.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to parties to a crime that applies here?
Fagan will be guilty to theft as a principal offender and Oliver not guilty of any offence.
correct
incorrect
Oliver will be guilty of theft as a principal offender and Fagan guilty as an accomplice.
correct
incorrect
Neither Fagan nor Oliver will be guilty as a principal offender.
correct
incorrect
Fagan will be guilty to theft as a principal offender and Oliver will be guilty as an accomplice.
correct
incorrect
Both Fagan and Oliver will be guilty of theft as Principal offenders.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Wayne paid for a ticket to watch Dolly perform and will write a review for a leading music site. He is aware that Dolly, an American performer, does not have a visa and will be paid for the performance, which is illegal. He clapped and cheered Dolly during the performance.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to parties to a crime that applies here?
Wayne is an accomplice to Dolly's offence only because he clapped at the performance.
correct
incorrect
Wayne is an accomplice to Dolly's offence because he encouraged her by paying for a ticket, attending, clapping, and writing a review of the performance.
correct
incorrect
Wayne is not an accomplice to Dolly's offence because he wrote a negative review.
correct
incorrect
Wayne is not an accomplice to Dolly's offence because he did not organise the performance.
correct
incorrect
Wayne is not an accomplice to Dolly's offence because she would have performed whether he attended the performance or not.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Harris was angry after an argument with Boyle and wanted to cause him serious physical harm. Hearing that Harris was angry with Boyle, Bateman gave Harris a knife to help Harris harm Boyle. Harris ignored the knife and shot Boyle several times in the chest. Miraculously, Boyle survived.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to parties to a crime that applies here?
Bateman is guilty as an accomplice to murder because he aided Harris to attack Boyle.
correct
incorrect
Bateman is guilty as an accomplice to murder because he abetted Harris to attack Boyle.
correct
incorrect
Bateman is guilty as an accomplice to a serious non-fatal offence because he aided Harris to commit the offence.
correct
incorrect
Bateman is not guilty as an accomplice to a serious non-fatal offence because he did not aid, abet, counsel, and procure Harris to commit the offence.
correct
incorrect
Bateman is guilty as an accomplice to a serious non-fatal offence because he abetted Harris to commit the offence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Ezra is a car mechanic and drops a crow bar he uses from time to time on the floor whilst working on a vehicle in the street. He is hungry at lunch time and leaves the crow bar, instead of putting it away. Rogan sees the crow bar, picks it up, and uses it to break into a neighbouring house.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to parties to a crime that applies here?
Rogan is an accomplice to a burglary and Ezra is the principal offender.
correct
incorrect
Rogan is a principal offender to a burglary and Ezra has assisted him.
correct
incorrect
Rogan is a principal offender to a burglary and Ezra has abetted him.
correct
incorrect
Rogan is a principal offender to a burglary, and Ezra is not an accomplice to it.
correct
incorrect
Rogan is a principal offender to a burglary, and Ezra has procured the offence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Wallace, a shopkeeper, sold Curtis a specialist tool for cutting very strong metals. He suspected Curtis would use it to take lead and other metals off other people's properties and sell it to scrap metal merchants, as he had recently heard that Curtis had left prison after serving a long sentence.
In fact, Curtis used the tool in a burglary at a farmhouse in the local area.
Which of the following statements most accurately applies to this scenario?
Following the case of
R v Bainbridge
, Wallace could be guilty as a principal offender to the burglary carried out by Curtis.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
R v Bainbridge
, Wallace would not be found guilty of burglary as an accomplice because he did not have any knowledge that Curtis would commit any crime.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
R v Bainbridge
, Wallace could be found guilty of burglary as an accomplice for aiding Curtis, as he knew the tool could have been used in a crime similar to the one committed.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
R v Bainbridge
, Wallace would be found to have entered into an unlawful joint enterprise with Curtis.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
R v Bainbridge
, Wallace could be found guilty of burglary as an accomplice for procuring Curtis to carry it out, as he knew the tool could have been used in a crime similar to the one committed.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Samson and Noah had heard that Paul was in charge of a drug-dealing gang in their area. They had started to talk about how they wanted to start dealing drugs, and how they would recruit others to do the actual selling to clients. They agreed to threaten Paul at his home using baseball bats. Noah had thought that they would only need to threaten Paul. However, Samson carried a knife with him, intending to use it. When Paul opened the door to them, Samson stabbed him to death, before any threats were made. This was shocking to Noah.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Samson is guilty of murder, but Noah is not guilty as an accessory to murder as he did not intend to assist or encourage Samson to commit this offence. Noah is not guilty of manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
Samson and Noah are both guilty of murder as principal offenders.
correct
incorrect
Samson is guilty or murder, but Noah is not guilty as an accessory to murder as he did not intend or foresee that Samson would commit murder. Noah would be guilty of manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
Samson is guilty of murder and Noah is guilty as an accessory to murder as Samson's action were within a range of offences Noah could contemplate that Samson would commit.
correct
incorrect
Samson and Noah are guilty of no crime because Paul was a drug dealer.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Iyaan and Isa knew that a delivery of stolen goods was made to Warren's warehouse at 7am every Friday. Together they planned to stop and attack the driver of the delivery lorry the next Friday. Isa bought them both guns and said to Iyaan, 'We only use them to kill the driver, if that is the only way!'
That Friday they drive in front of the lorry and break into the cab. Despite screaming at the driver, Charlie, to get out, he refuses, and Iyaan believes that Charlie is reaching out for a weapon of his own. Iyaan shoots Charlie dead. The police catch them both when they stop the lorry, driven by Isa, for driving erratically.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Iyaan and Isa are both criminally liable as principal offenders for the robbery and Charlie's murder.
correct
incorrect
Iyaan is the only party criminally liable for the robbery and Charlie's murder.
correct
incorrect
Iyaan and Isa are both guilty as principal offenders to robbery. Iyaan is also guilty of Charlie's murder as the principal offender and Isa is not liable in relation to the murder.
correct
incorrect
Iyaan and Isa are both guilty as principal offenders to robbery. Iyaan is also guilty of Charlie's murder as the principal offender and Isa is guilty as an accessory to murder.
correct
incorrect
Iyaan and Isa are both guilty of theft as principal offenders. Iyaan is also guilty of Charlie's murder as the principal offender and Isa is guilty as an accessory to murder.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
David is at a party. When he goes to the bathroom, he hears sounds of a struggle coming from a bedroom. He enters the bedroom and witnesses Oscar clearly raping Christine, as he is hitting her around the head as she shouts for help. David stays in the room and claps Oscar, who continues to rape Christine.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Following the case of
R v Coney
, David will not be liable as an accessory to rape as the offence begun before he provided encouragement to Oscar.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
R v Coney
, David's mere presence alone is sufficient to establish him as an accessory to rape.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
R v Clarkson
, David will be liable as an accessory to rape as he encourages Oscar to carry on the offence.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
R v Clarkson
, David's mere presence alone is sufficient to establish him as an accessory to rape.
correct
incorrect
Following
R v Jogee
, David is guilty of rape as a joint principal offender.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Michael gave Roger a knife for him to use to rape Michael's wife, Rita. Michael hated Rita because she would belittle him in front of his friends. Roger, instead, used the knife to rape Julia, his next-door neighbour, something he had been secretly fantasising about for some time.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Roger is the principal offender of rape and Michael is not an accessory to rape because he did not intend to help Roger rape Julia.
correct
incorrect
Roger is the principal offender of rape and Michael is an accessory to rape because he intended to help Roger rape his wife and his mens rea can be transferred.
correct
incorrect
Roger is not guilty of raping Julia.
correct
incorrect
Both Roger and Michael are guilty of raping Julia as principal offenders.
correct
incorrect
Roger alone is guilty of raping Julia.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Gerard provides Donovan with a gun intending that he use it to kill Arthur. On the night of the killing, it is foggy, and Donovan mistakenly shoots and kills Jamie, believing him to be Arthur.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Donovan and Gerard will be guilty of Jamie's manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
Donovan and Gerard will be guilty of Arthur's attempted murder.
correct
incorrect
Donovan will be guilty of murder as a principal offender and Gerard will not be liable as an accessory.
correct
incorrect
Donovan will be guilty as a principal offender to murder and Gerard will be guilty for manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
Donovan will be guilty as a principal offender to murder and Gerard will be guilty as an accessory to murder.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Lance gave his licenced gun to Justin. He knew Justin planned to shoot his wife, Aida, at home later that evening. In fact, Jason did not shoot Aida that evening, but the next day whilst they were picnicking by the canal.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Justin is guilty of Aida's murder as a principal offender, and Lance is guilty as an accomplice to murder.
correct
incorrect
Justin is guilty of Aida's murder as a principal offender, and Lance is not guilty as an accomplice to murder as he did not know that Lance would kill Aida at a picnic.
correct
incorrect
Justin is guilty of Aida's murder as a principal offender, and Lance is not guilty as an accomplice to murder as he did not know that Lance would kill Aida the next day.
correct
incorrect
Justin is guilty of Aida's murder as a principal offender, and Lance is guilty of manslaughter.
correct
incorrect
Jason and Lance are both guilty of Aida's murder as co-principal offenders.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Terence had a licenced gun that he stored legally in a gun cupboard in his garage. For the most part he remembered to lock the cupboard, but every now and then he forgot, especially if he was running late for dinner after a shooting session. His son, Parker (aged 21), was fed up with having no money and decided to take his dad's gun and rob the local post office. Parker waited for an occasion to find the gun cupboard unlocked, and when he did he robbed the post office.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Parker would not be guilty of robbery as it was not his gun.
correct
incorrect
Terence would not be guilty of robbery as he legally owned the gun and was not aware that Parker would use it as he did.
correct
incorrect
Terence would be guilty of robbery because he did assist Parker by leaving the gun cupboard locked.
correct
incorrect
Terence would not be guilty of robbery because he did not assist Parker.
correct
incorrect
Terence would not be guilty of robbery as an accessory as he was only reckless as to assisting Parker.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Jaris and Eustace were known to dislike their sister Iris. They had been heard by their neighbour talking about how they wanted Iris to be gone and never return, because she was trouble. Jaris was heard saying, 'I'd stab her, you know.'
One day, the police discovered Iris' body covered in leaves. She had been stabbed to death and the knife was with her body. Forensics found no fingerprints.
Enquiries found that both Jaris and Eustace had been out together the night Iris had gone missing and there had been one sighting of them both walking with their sister. Both denied killing Iris.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on accessorial liability that applies to this scenario?
Both Jaris and Eustace may be liable for Iris' murder as principal offenders regardless of whether it can proved which of them stabbed her.
correct
incorrect
Jaris may be found guilty of killing Iris as a principal offender as he was heard saying that he would stab her.
correct
incorrect
Jaris may be found guilty of killing Iris as a principal offender as he was heard saying that he would stab her, and Eustace may be liable as an accomplice to her murder.
correct
incorrect
Neither Jaris or Eustace can be found liable for Iris' murder without more evidence to show which of them stabbed her.
correct
incorrect
Eustace can be found to be an accessory to murder even if Jaris is acquitted of her murder.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country