Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Subject Area Student Resources for Criminal Law
Self-test questions: Inchoate offences
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Gillespie discovered that a huge consignment of used banknotes was to be moved from Birmingham to London by road, during the early hours of Monday. Gillespie spent the next few days secretly drawing up a plan for the interception and theft of that money. He contacted Blue, who 'agreed' to provide a lockup garage nearby in which the hijacked van could be concealed and unloaded. Unknown to Gillespie, Blue was working as a police informer, and at once passed the information on to the police.
Which of the following most accurately reflects the application of the law on parties to a crime in respect of this scenario?
Gillespie would not be guilty of conspiracy to commit theft because Blue is a police informer.
correct
incorrect
Gillespie would not be guilty of conspiracy to commit theft because there was only one other party to the agreement.
correct
incorrect
Gillespie would only be guilty of a conspiracy to commit theft if Blue intended at the time of the agreement to allow the theft to take place and provide the lockup, regardless of his motive.
correct
incorrect
Gillespie would only be guilty of conspiring to commit theft if Blue was a minor.
correct
incorrect
Gillespie would be guilty of conspiring to commit theft because Blue is a police informer.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Doris, Arthur and Rose disliked Phyliss because she was always complaining about the staff at the assisted living housing complex where they all lived. Rose had overheard Phyliss saying that the care was so bad that she may as well be dead. Phyliss' complaining was spoiling the atmosphere of the community, so the three of them agreed that one of them should poison Phyliss during lunch by putting a mixture of their prescribed drugs in her drink. Rose had the mixture with her at lunch the next day, but Phyliss was unwell and did not attend. Doris, Arthur and Rose then changed their mind and did not carry out the plan.
Doris and Arthur are married to each other.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law in respect of conspiracy as it applies to Doris, Arthur and Rose?
Arthur and Rose are guilty of conspiring to murder Phyliss, but Doris would not because she is married to Arthur.
correct
incorrect
None of the three parties are liable of a conspiracy to commit murder because the plan was not put into action.
correct
incorrect
Only Rose is guilty of conspiring to commit murder, because Doris and Arthur are married to each other.
correct
incorrect
All three parties are guilty of conspiracy to commit murder. In does not matter that Doris and Arthur are married to each other.
correct
incorrect
None of the three parties are liable for conspiring to commit murder because Phyliss did not die.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
One evening at the local public house, an argument developed between Lewis and Ava on the one side, and a third person, Verity. Shortly afterwards, Verity left the pub whereupon Lewis and Ava agreed that they would follow her and, if a suitable opportunity arose, they would 'beat her up and put her in hospital for a month.' Five minutes later, however, a violent thunderstorm erupted, and so the plan was abandoned and Lewis and Ava stayed in the pub.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the criminal liability of Lewis and Ava for a conspiracy offence?
Lewis and Ava will be guilty of conspiring to commit a serious non-fatal offence because they agreed to commit an offence should the opportunity arise.
correct
incorrect
Lewis and Ava will not be guilty of a criminal conspiracy because the plan was based on the condition that a suitable opportunity would arise.
correct
incorrect
Lewis and Ava will be guilty of a criminal conspiracy because they had a plan that they would certainly carry out no matter what.
correct
incorrect
Lewis and Ava will not be guilty of a criminal conspiracy because they were friends and not criminal colleagues.
correct
incorrect
Lewis and Ava will be guilty of a criminal conspiracy because they were civil partners.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Sonal and Sumar, sister and brother, have a business together that is not doing very well. They have accrued a large amount of debt and are facing bankruptcy. Their grandmother, Adrika, has been unwell for several months and is very frail. Upon her death, both Sonal and Sumar would inherit her house. Thinking that they would sell Adrika's house and save themselves from bankruptcy, Sonal and Sumar agree that they will poison Adrika that evening. Sonal planned to provide the powder from grinding down tablets that were prescribed to her, and Sumar agreed to put the substance into Adrika's last cup of tea.
When they arrived at Adrika's house that evening, they found that she had died in the morning, before they had formed their plan.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to inchoate offences as it applies to Sonal and Sumar?
Neither Sonal nor Sumar are liable for conspiracy to murder, because Adrika was dead at the time they agreed to kill her.
correct
incorrect
Sonal and Sumar are both liable for conspiracy to murder, despite the fact that they agreed to kill Adrika when she was already dead.
correct
incorrect
Sonal is liable for conspiracy to murder Adrika, but Sumar is not, because Sonal had prepared the substance to be used in order to kill. Sumar has done nothing.
correct
incorrect
Neither Sonal or Sumar are liable for conspiracy to murder, because they had not attempted to commit the principal offence.
correct
incorrect
Sonal and Sumar are both liable for conspiracy to murder, because they have both attempted to put their plan into action.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Michael owned and operated a currency exchange business. For the first year his turnover was quite low, but it increased dramatically the following year. Some of his clients had asked him to come to visit them in their homes, so that they did not have to attend his office. They would then exchange large amounts of money. Michael was suspicious that some of his clients may be involved in criminal activity, but continued to do business with them.
Which of the following statements is most in respect of the law relating to criminal conspiracies?
Following the case of
Anderson
, Michael will be liable for a conspiracy offence because he had a suspicion which is sufficient for the principal offence.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
Yip Chiu-Cheung
, Michael will be liable for a conspiracy because at least one party had the intention and knowledge about the principal offence.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
Anderson
, only Michael will be liable for a conspiracy offence because he had knowledge of all the elements of the principal offence.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
Saik
, Michael will not be liable for a conspiracy offence because he did not intend or know every element of the principal offence.
correct
incorrect
Following the case of
Saik
and s. 1(2) Criminal Law Act 1977, Michael will not be liable for a conspiracy offence because he did not intend or know every element of the principal offence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Frieda did not have any money left from her universal credit payment and there was no food left at home. She took her daughter, Elise (aged 9), to the local supermarket after they discussed that Elise would put some food into a rucksack that they took to the shop.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law of criminal conspiracies as it applies to this scenario?
Frieda and Elise would both be guilty of a conspiracy to steal.
correct
incorrect
Frieda alone would be guilty of a conspiracy to steal.
correct
incorrect
Elise alone would be guilty of a conspiracy to steal.
correct
incorrect
Neither Frieda nor Elise would be guilty of a conspiracy to steal, because Elise is a minor.
correct
incorrect
Neither Frieda nor Elise would be guilty of a conspiracy to steal, because they were hungry and had no money.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
After a disagreement at the local public house with Stan, Darren and Wayne discussed ideas about how to shut Stan up by killing him. They knew his address, which was a ground floor flat, and discussed how Darren would hide in a bus opposite the window of Stan's front room and shoot him when his back was turned away from the window. Wayne believed this was a hypothetical situation and had no intention of either him or Darren killing Stan. Darren carried out what they had discussed and shot Stan in the head when he was sat in a chair by the window. In fact, when a post mortem was carried out it showed that Stan had died in the night and was already dead when Darren shot him.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to inchoate offences as it applies to this scenario?
Darren is liable for attempted murder as he fired the gun and intended to kill Stan. Wayne is not guilty of any offence.
correct
incorrect
Darren is liable for attempted murder as he fired the gun and intended to kill Stan. Wayne is guilty of conspiring to commit murder.
correct
incorrect
Darren is liable for murder as he fired the gun and intended to kill Stan. Wayne is not guilty of any offence.
correct
incorrect
Darren is liable for murder as he fired the gun and intended to kill Stan. Wayne is guilty of conspiring to commit murder.
correct
incorrect
Darren and Wayne are not liable for any offence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Gerard decided to rob a rural shop. He drove thirty miles to get to the shop and was arrested by the police as he got out of his car carrying a shotgun and wearing a balaclava.
Would Gerard be criminally liable for an offence?
Gerard would be guilty of attempted robbery as he has committed acts that are more than merely preparatory to the commission of the offence.
correct
incorrect
Gerard would not be guilty of attempted robbery as he at no point had an intention to carry out the principal offence.
correct
incorrect
Gerard would be guilty of attempted robbery as he was reckless as to committing the robbery.
correct
incorrect
Gerard would not be guilty of attempted robbery as he has not committed acts that are more than preparatory to the commission of the offence.
correct
incorrect
Gerard would be guilty of a conspiracy to commit robbery.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Rita intended to kill her grandfather, Bill, and placed poison in his coffee when they visited a local coffee shop. Bill took a sip of the coffee, but died of a heart attack when he discovered on his tablet just how little tax the coffee shop paid. The poison had not taken effect.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on inchoate offences that applies to this scenario?
Rita is guilty of murder.
correct
incorrect
Rita is guilty of attempted murder.
correct
incorrect
Rita is not guilty of attempted murder, because Bill died of a heart attack that was unrelated to the poison.
correct
incorrect
Rita is not guilty of attempted murder, because, unknown to her, it was not possible to kill him before his heart attack via the method she had chosen.
correct
incorrect
Rita is guilty of conspiring to kill Bill, because she had planned his death.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Scott walked home from his job at a laser tag company. On his way he saw an open door of a shop and through it he could see a £20 note on the counter. He decided to take the money and entered the shop to do so. It is at that point he discovered that the money was a picture and not real.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law on inchoate offences that applies to this scenario?
Scott is not guilty of a criminal attempt, because the principal offence was impossible to commit.
correct
incorrect
Scott is guilty of burglary.
correct
incorrect
Scott is of attempted burglary
correct
incorrect
Scott is not guilty of a criminal attempt, because he behaved in an opportunistic way.
correct
incorrect
Scott is not guilty of a criminal attempt,
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Joseph wanted to buy his mother a present for her birthday, but he did not have any money to do so. He decided to go to a gift shop to see if there was anything there worth stealing. He took a knife out of his pocket and entered the shop. As soon as he had entered the shop he was arrested by an undercover police officer.
What offence, if any, would Joseph be charged with?
Joseph would not be charged with any offence.
correct
incorrect
Joseph would be charged with a conspiracy to commit theft.
correct
incorrect
Joseph would be charged with a conspiracy to commit robbery.
correct
incorrect
Joseph would be charged with attempted theft.
correct
incorrect
Joseph would be charged with attempted robbery.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Luke had seen the warning light on his car that his brake pads were worn out. He did not have enough money to get new brake pads put in at the garage and decided to drive the car as little as possible. One day his wife, Chen, noticed that they had run out of milk and got into Luke's car; she was also insured to drive it. She began to drive to the nearby supermarket, but unfortunately, she was seriously injured in a car accident. Forensics found that she had lost control of the car as the brakes had failed.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the relevant criminal law principles that applies to this scenario?
Luke is guilty of attempted murder, because he intended to kill Chen.
correct
incorrect
Luke is guilty of attempted murder, because he was reckless as to killing Chen.
correct
incorrect
Luke is guilty of attempted murder, because he was negligent as to killing Chen.
correct
incorrect
Luke is guilty of battery, as he has indirectly applied force to Chen intentionally.
correct
incorrect
Luke is not guilty of an inchoate offence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Tessa printed a number of leaflets explaining her view that all men associated with Fathers for Justice had committed domestic abuse against their previous partners and their children. She stated on the leaflet that the reader should throw stones at men they knew who were affiliated with the organisation, as a gesture to shame them.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in respect to the law on inchoate offences in this scenario?
Tessa will be liable under S. 44 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Tessa will be liable under s. 45 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Tessa will be liable under s. 46 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Tessa will be liable for attempted battery.
correct
incorrect
Tessa will be liable for conspiracy to commit a battery.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Herbert has a gun shop and normally sells guns legally. However, Percy offered Herbert a substantial amount more than the asking price for one particular gun, on the condition that Herbert would overlook the fact that Percy did not have a current gun licence. Herbert accepted the deal and hoped that Percy would use it appropriately, although he believed this was unlikely as Percy had needed lots of advice about how to shoot the gun, which Herbert had given him.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to inchoate offences as it applies to this scenario?
Herbert is most likely to be guilty of no offence.
correct
incorrect
Herbert is most likely to be guilty under s, 44 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Herbert is most likely to be guilty under s. 45 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Herbert is most likely to be guilty under s, 46 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Herbert and Percy are guilty of a conspiracy to kill.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Archie buys a gun from Sol. Sol is happy to make a profit from the sale of the gun. However, he knows that Archie has a criminal record for committing robberies and has recently had an argument with Larson, a loan shark that charges his clients extortionate interest. Sol is not sure whether Sol will use the gun to rob Larson or to kill him.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to inchoate offences?
Sol is most likely guilty of no inchoate offence.
correct
incorrect
Sol is most likely to be guilty under s. 44 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Sol is most likely to be guilty under s. 45 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Sol is most likely to be guilty under s. 46 Serious Crime Act 2007.
correct
incorrect
Archie and Sol are guilty of a conspiracy to rob.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country