Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Subject Area Student Resources for Criminal Law
Self-test questions: Capacity/denials
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Faye and Oliver went to the cinema and watched a scary movie. Faye had spent a large part of her day standing up and her muscles felt stiff when she watched the movie. At a particularly gruesome part of the movie she experienced a sudden leg cramp and kicked Oliver hard in his leg causing a red mark.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to denials of offences as it applies to this scenario?
Faye would be guilty of an offence of battery as she applied unlawful force to Oliver recklessly.
correct
incorrect
Faye would be guilty of an offence of battery as she applied unlawful force to Oliver intentionally.
correct
incorrect
Faye would not be liable for an offence as she acted in a state of insane automatism.
correct
incorrect
Faye would not be liable for an offence as she was at fault for standing up most of the day.
correct
incorrect
Faye would not be liable for an offence as she acted involuntary and therefore no actus reus can be established.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Arnie was keen to lose weight and had missed his evening meal before he went to the cinema. He managed to avoid treating himself to a tub of popcorn and a sugary drink during the movie. As a diabetic he had taken his insulin before coming out to the cinema. After the movie had finished, he went to leave the cinema and pushed Alicia, a cinema employee, to the floor and kicked her so hard she had extensive bruising to her abdomen for a couple of weeks. He claimed to have no recollection of the incident and medical evidence later confirmed that at the time of the attack he was in a hypoglycaemic state.
Which of the following statements is the most accurately reflects the law relating to denials of an offence to this scenario?
Arnie is most likely guilty of an assault.
correct
incorrect
Arnie could successfully argue that he was an insane automaton at the time of the attack.
correct
incorrect
Arnie could successfully argue that he was a sane automaton at the time of the attack, although he may remain liable for an assault occasioning actual bodily harm as he was at fault by missing his evening meal.
correct
incorrect
Arnie could successfully argue that he was a sane automaton at the time of the attack, with no prior fault.
correct
incorrect
Arnie is most likely guilty of causing grievous bodily harm with intent.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
On recent shopping trips Ethel (aged 80) had been scared by the presence of young men, who had looked at her in a threatening manner, or so she believed. On this occasion she put a long kitchen knife in her bag to protect herself, should she be attacked.
She had drunk a bottle of brandy to give her confidence to go out, but she was not used to drinking and it made her feel strange.
At the shop she saw Charles walking towards her. He was in fact leaving the shop. Imagining that he was brandishing a weapon, she stabbed him with the knife she had taken with her to the shops.
Charles suffered very serious injuries, but did survive. Medical opinion was that Ethel was very drunk at the time of the attack and most likely was not aware of what she was doing.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law as it applies to this scenario?
Ethel would be liable for maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm to Charles, because her intoxication reduces her liability from a specific intent offence to a basic one.
correct
incorrect
Ethel would be liable for causing grievous bodily harm to Charles, because her intoxication is irrelevant to the circumstances.
correct
incorrect
Ethel would be liable for causing grievous bodily harm as she was at fault for being so intoxicated.
correct
incorrect
Ethel would not be liable for any offence as she was in an state of sane automatism caused by the external factor of her intoxication.
correct
incorrect
Ethel would not be liable for any offence because she could successfully argue that she was in a state of insane automatism.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Oscar is a diabetic and went on a coach trip with friends from his bridge club. He had forgotten to take his insulin that morning and had not taken a packed lunch on the coach as he expected that everyone would stop to eat at a motorway restaurant. He enjoyed much of the day, but as late afternoon approached, he became erratic and pushed over a passer-by, Sheila. He was totally unaware of this behaviour, and medical evidence suggests that at the time he pushed Sheila over he was in a hyperglycaemic state.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to incapacity defences as it applies to Oscar?
Oscar would not be guilty of a battery because he was a sane automaton at the time of the incident.
correct
incorrect
Oscar would either be not guilty for reason of insanity, or could choose to plead guilty to a battery.
correct
incorrect
Oscar would be considered to have acted voluntarily and therefore guilty of a battery.
correct
incorrect
Oscar would be guilty of inflicting a wound on Sheila, because he was an insane automaton at the time of the incident.
correct
incorrect
Oscar would have to be found not guilty for reason of insanity.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Kingsley had a juvenile criminal record for a large number of theft offences; he had enjoyed the excitement of stealing. As an adult he had controlled his urge to steal and had stopped altogether. His friend, Jermaine, spiked Kingsley's drink with an intoxicant, hoping that Kinsgley would do something silly that Jermaine could post on social media. Jermaine wanted to beat his highest number of likes. Unaware that his drink had been spiked, Kingsley found himself stealing a number of items from a department store. He was caught as he left the shop.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to incapacity defences as it applies to this scenario?
Kingsley will be guilty of theft regardless of the fact he had involuntarily taken an intoxicant.
correct
incorrect
Kingsley would be not guilty for reason of insanity as he was an insane automaton at the time of the theft.
correct
incorrect
Kingsley would be guilty of theft because he was voluntarily intoxicated.
correct
incorrect
Kingsley was voluntarily intoxicated and will be completely acquitted of theft, as long as he was acting in an automaton state and the intoxicant had not merely reduced his inhibitions.
correct
incorrect
Kingsley was involuntarily intoxicated and will be completely acquitted of theft, as long as he was acting in an automaton state and the intoxicant had not merely reduced his inhibitions.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Darnell was at a party for the first time. His mum was very strict and normally he was not allowed out at night. However, on this occasion he sneaked out while she was asleep. He avoided drinking alcohol because he knew he needed to get home without his mum finding out he had been out. His acquaintance, Trevon, got him a drink, and without telling Darnell, he poured a large amount of vodka into it. Trevon did this several times and Darnell became very drunk. Darnell entered into an argument with Andre and attacked him by banging his head hard against the wall several times, causing his skull to crack.
Andre was in intensive care for a couple of weeks and his speech was permanently altered, so that he spoke much more slowly than he had before the attack.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflect the law on intoxication as it applies to this scenario?
If Darnell was completely unaware of his actions, he will be not guilty of any offence as his intoxication was involuntary.
correct
incorrect
If Darnell was completely unaware of his actions, he will be guilty of maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm on Andre.
correct
incorrect
Darnell will be guilty of causing grievous bodily harm with an intent to do so, regardless of the fact that he was intoxicated.
correct
incorrect
Darnell would be treated by the court as an insane automaton, and will be not guilty by reason of insanity.
correct
incorrect
If Darnell was aware of his actions, he will be guilty of a battery occasioning actual bodily harm on Andre.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Darnell was at a party for the first time. His mum was very strict and normally he was not allowed out at night. However, on this occasion he sneaked out while she was asleep. He was not used to drinking, but decided to have rum and coke at the party. He did not keep track of how many drinks he had, and became very drunk, to the point where he could not remember what he did for much of that evening.
In fact, Darnell had an argument with Malik, and attacked him by banging his head hard against the wall several times, causing Malik's skull to crack.
Malik was in intensive care for a couple of weeks and his speech was permanently altered, so that he spoke much more slowly than he had before the attack.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflect the law on intoxication as it applies to this scenario?
If Darnell was completely unaware of his actions, he will be not guilty of any offence as his intoxication was involuntary.
correct
incorrect
If Darnell was completely unaware of his actions, he will be guilty of maliciously inflicting grievous bodily harm on Malik.
correct
incorrect
Darnell will be guilty of causing grievous bodily harm with and intent to do so, regardless of the fact that he was intoxicated.
correct
incorrect
Darnell would be treated by the court as an insane automaton, and will be not guilty by reason of insanity.
correct
incorrect
If Darnell was aware of his actions, he will be guilty of a battery occasioning actual bodily harm on Malik.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Shanice had a stomach ache and Nia suggested she take some of her prescribed tablets for a stomach problem she had. Desperate to feel better and assured by Nia that there were no side effects, Shanice took the pills.
After a couple of hours Shanice started to feel very strange and became enraged, a feeling that she could not control. She started to throw furniture at the walls causing damage to the walls and the furniture.
Which of the following statements is most accurate in respect of the law on intoxication and this scenario?
Shanice will be able to successfully argue the defence of insanity.
correct
incorrect
Shanice will most likely be deemed to be an insane automaton and not guilty of criminal damage by reason of insanity.
correct
incorrect
Shanice will most likely be deemed to be voluntarily intoxicated and guilty of criminal damage.
correct
incorrect
Shanice will most likely be deemed to be involuntarily intoxicated and not guilty of any criminal damage as the drugs she had taken are not known to cause the side effects that it did.
correct
incorrect
Shanice will most likely argue diminished responsibility because of the effect the pills had on her.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
DeAnna was a very annoying neighbour and had asked Richard to stop playing his music during the day, to not park his car so close to her house, and to wear more clothes when he used his garage gym with the door open. Richard wanted to teach DeAnna a lesson and decided he would throw paint at her front door during the evening. This was not the sort of behaviour he would normally do, so before he set off he drank a large amount of whiskey to give him the confidence to carry out his plan.
Once suitably drunk for the task, he went out and threw paint all over DeAnna's front door. Which of the following statements most accurately reflects Richard's criminal liability?
Richard can most likely successfully argue that he lost self-control and is not liable for criminal damage.
correct
incorrect
Richard can most likely successfully argue that his responsibility was diminished as a result of DeAnna's unreasonable behaviour.
correct
incorrect
Richard could argue that he was an insane automaton at the time to the incident and is not guilty of criminal damage by reason of insanity.
correct
incorrect
Richard was voluntarily intoxicated at the time of the incident and is liable for the basic intent offence of criminal damage.
correct
incorrect
Richard was involuntarily intoxicated at the time of the incident and is not liable for criminal damage.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following defence elements does not make up part of the defence of insanity?
D had a defect of reason.
correct
incorrect
The defect was the result of a disease of the mind.
correct
incorrect
The defect was the result of an abnormality of mental functioning.
correct
incorrect
D did not know that what he was doing was legally wrong.
correct
incorrect
D did not know the nature and quality of their act.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Precious suffered from epilepsy and cared for her grandmother. One day, suffering from a mild seizure caused by her epileptic condition, Precious kicked her grandmother, which resulted in her falling over and breaking an arm.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to incapacity defences as it applies to this scenario?
Precious has no defence to a s. 20 Offences Against the Person Act 1861 offence.
correct
incorrect
Precious would be able to successfully argue the defence of insane automatism to a s. 20 Offence Against the Person Act 1861 offence, because her condition that caused the seizure was an internal factor.
correct
incorrect
Precious would be able to successfully argue the defence of insane automatism to a s. 20 Offence Against the Person Act 1861 offence and receive a complete acquittal.
correct
incorrect
Precious would be able to successfully argue the defence of sane automatism to a s. 20 Offence Against the Person Act 1861 offence, because her condition that caused the seizure was an internal factor.
correct
incorrect
Precious would not be able to successfully argue the defence of sane automatism to a s. 20 Offence Against the Person Act 1861 offence, because her condition that caused the seizure was an internal factor.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Morris suffered from schizophrenia but was not diagnosed. He lived at home with his mother, who kept his strange behaviour a secret from the local authorities. One morning, Morris suffered a terrible delusion and with a knife he cut his mother's throat, believing that she was a loaf of bread.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to insanity as it applies to Morris?
Morris did not suffer from a disease of the mind.
correct
incorrect
Morris did not have a defect of reason.
correct
incorrect
Morris did not understand the nature and quality of his actions.
correct
incorrect
Morris without doubt did not know that his actions were legally wrong.
correct
incorrect
Morris's actions were the result of an external cause.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Morris is found not guilty by reason of insanity.
Which of the following orders can a judge not theoretically make in respect of Morris, following this verdict?
A hospital order with a restriction order.
correct
incorrect
A hospital order without a restriction order.
correct
incorrect
A supervision order.
correct
incorrect
A community order with a Mental Health Treatment Requirement.
correct
incorrect
Life imprisonment in a jail.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Connor suffered from a paranoia disorder. He often imagined that people around him were spying on him and giving information to people that would kill him. His neighbour, Josie, often said hello to him in the morning, in a bid to be friendly. Connor became convinced that she was a spy and he would be killed if he she was able to live. He waited until she left her house and hit her with a hammer until she was dead.
Which of the following statements most accurately reflects the law relating to insanity as it applies to Connor?
Connor did not suffer from a disease of the mind.
correct
incorrect
Connor did not have a defect of reason.
correct
incorrect
It is most likely that Connor did know the nature of his actions, but did not know that his actions were legally wrong, as he was defending himself from a threat that he perceived to exist.
correct
incorrect
It is most likely that Connor did know the nature of his actions, and did know that his actions were legally wrong, as the force he used to protect him from the perceived threat was unreasonable.
correct
incorrect
It is most likely that Connor did not know the nature of his actions, but did know that his actions were legally wrong, as the force he used to protect him from the perceived threat was unreasonable.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Trevor loved his wife very much but one day attacked her head with a hammer. She died from her injuries. Medical examination revealed that Trevor had suffered from a congestion of blood in his brain, and this resulted in a lapse of consciousness at the time of the attack. This problem was the result of a condition called arteriosclerosis, a physical-not mental-condition.
Which of the following answers refers to the correct case and its principle that applies to Trevor?
According to the court in
Kemp
, Trevor would not be deemed to have suffered from disease of the mind for the purposes of the defence of insanity, because his condition was physical and not mental.
correct
incorrect
According to the court in
Kemp
, Trevor would be deemed to have suffered from disease of the mind for the purposes of the defence of insanity, despite the fact that his condition was physical and not mental.
correct
incorrect
According to the court in
Bratty
, Trevor would be deemed to have suffered from disease of the mind for the purposes of the defence of insanity, despite the fact that his condition was physical and not mental.
correct
incorrect
According to the court in
Bratty
, Trevor would not be deemed to have suffered from disease of the mind for the purposes of the defence of insanity, because his condition was physical and not mental.
correct
incorrect
According to the court in
Clarke
, Trevor would not have suffered from a defect of reason arising from a disease of the mind.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Submit Quiz
Next Question
Reset
Exit Quiz
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country