Kant argues that the moral worth of an action is determined solely by the principle that motivates it and not by any consequences that might follow from it. A morally valid principle is one that can serve as a universal law, applicable to all at any time or in any place, without resulting in a contradiction. Such a principle is “categorical” (as opposed to “hypothetical”); it enjoins an action that is good of itself and not merely as a means to another end. Because humanity, in oneself or in others, is of absolute worth, Kant is able to give the categorical imperative a second formulation: “So act that you use humanity, whether in your own person or in the person of any other, always at the same time as an end, never merely as a means.”

Back to top