Skip to main content
United States
Jump To
Support
Register or Log In
Support
Register or Log In
Instructors
Browse Products
Getting Started
Students
Browse Products
Getting Started
Return to Tort Law Directions 8e Student Resources
Chapter 3 Self-test questions
Quiz Content
*
not completed
.
Which statement most accurately describes the
reasonable man
, or person
?
They are neither excessively risk-taking or careful.
correct
incorrect
They show the care in every situation which a judge would show.
correct
incorrect
They must behave like the average person of their age.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following cases is the best authority for the position that the knowledge of the defendant may increase his standard of care?
Donoghue v Stevenson
correct
incorrect
Nettleship v Weston
correct
incorrect
Roe v Minister of Health
correct
incorrect
Paris v London Borough of Stepney
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
For which of the following groups is the objective or reasonable man/person test significantly modified?
Pregnant women.
correct
incorrect
Children.
correct
incorrect
The elderly.
correct
incorrect
The disabled.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following is
not
an essential ingredient of
res ipsa loquitur
?
Control at all times by the defendant.
correct
incorrect
The absence of an exact explanation of what caused the accident.
correct
incorrect
The claimant does not have access to all the relevant documents.
correct
incorrect
The accident was one which does not ordinarily happen in the absence of negligence.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The cricket club in
Bolton v Stone
was held not to have behaved reasonably in guarding against an accident caused by a stray ball.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following cases resulted in a finding that the cost of avoiding the risk outweighed the risk and therefore the defendant had not been negligent?
Latimer v AEC
correct
incorrect
The Wagon Mound 2
correct
incorrect
Philips v William Whiteley
correct
incorrect
Vowles v Evans
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which statement most accurately reflects the law regarding duties of care in sporting activities?
Spectators are taken to have consented to all the risks run in watching the relevant activity.
correct
incorrect
Participants in sporting events are owed the duty of care which is appropriate to all the circumstances.
correct
incorrect
Participants in sporting events are owed a lower duty of care than a non-sportsman.
correct
incorrect
Participants in sporting events are taken to have consented to the risk of injury.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The '
Bolam
test' involves the judges imposing their own views as to what professional behaviour is negligent in a certain situation.
True
correct
incorrect
False
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Which of the following facts was
not
significant to the decision in the
Wagon Mound 2
?
It was rubbish floating on the oil which eventually caught fire.
correct
incorrect
The discharging of oil into the sea by the defendants was unnecessary and in fact illegal.
correct
incorrect
The claimant's employees had stopped work to inquire whether or not it was safe to continue welding.
correct
incorrect
The ignition of a spark led to a huge explosion and fire.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
Sita is a young registrar in a surgical unit of the local hospital. Which of the following cases would be most applicable to determine the duty of care expected of her?
Shakoor v Situ
correct
incorrect
Wells v Cooper
correct
incorrect
Wilsher v Essex AHA
correct
incorrect
Knight v Home Office
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The 'prudent patient' test was discussed by:
Lord Reid in
The Wagon Mound 2
.
correct
incorrect
Lord Scarman in
Sidaway
.
correct
incorrect
Lord Bridge in
Sidaway
.
correct
incorrect
McNair J in
Bolam
.
correct
incorrect
*
not completed
.
The effect of the application of
res ipsa loquitur
is:
Trueo put the burden wholly on the defendant to disprove negligence beyond reasonable doubt.
correct
incorrect
to ensure that the claimant wins his case.
correct
incorrect
to allow both parties to assume certain facts despite lack of proof.
correct
incorrect
to make his defence, the defendant will now have to put forward a plausible explanation consistent with lack of negligence.
correct
incorrect
Previous Question
Exit Quiz
Next Question
Review & Submit
Submit Quiz
Reset
Are you sure?
You have some unanswered questions. Do you really want to submit?
Back to top
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
Select your Country