* not completed

. Which of the following accurately describes the 'but for' test?

But for the claimant's fault, the damage would not have occurred correct incorrect

But for the defendant's negligence, the damage would not have occurred correct incorrect

But for the defendant's negligence, the damage would have occurred correct incorrect

But for the claimant's fault, the damage would have occurred correct incorrect

* not completed

. Why was the defendant not liable in Barnett v Kensington & Chelsea Management Committee?

It had caused the damage, but it was too remote correct incorrect

It had been negligent but the plaintiff had caused his own loss correct incorrect

It had been negligent but this had not caused the plaintiff's death correct incorrect

It had not been negligent correct incorrect

* not completed

. Cook v Lewis is an example of which principle?

Joint and several liability correct incorrect

Several liability correct incorrect

Contributory negligence correct incorrect

The application of the 'but for' test correct incorrect

* not completed

. Why was the defendant not liable in Hotson v Berkshire AHA?

The claimant failed to establish the cause of his injury correct incorrect

The claimant failed to establish whether the defendant had been negligent correct incorrect

The defendant proved that he hadn't caused the damage correct incorrect

The claimant failed to establish that he had more than a 50% chance of recovery correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which case is the odd one out?

Bonnington Castings v Wardlaw correct incorrect

Wilsher v Essex Area Health Authority correct incorrect

Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services correct incorrect

McGhee v National Coal Board correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following statements is true of the current state of causation in relation to mesothelioma?

It is governed by the law as stated in Barker v Corus correct incorrect

It is governed by the 'but for' test correct incorrect

It is governed by s 3 of the Compensation Act 2006 correct incorrect

It does not give rise to joint and several liability correct incorrect

* not completed

. Performance Cars v Abraham illustrates the problem of consecutive causes

True correct incorrect

False correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following pairs of cases illustrate the same principle of causation?

Hotson v Essex AHA and Gregg v Scott correct incorrect

Baker v Willoughby and Barker v Corus correct incorrect

Chester v Ashfar and Fairchild v Glenhaven Funeral Services correct incorrect

Jobling v Associated Dairies and Performance Cars v Abraham correct incorrect

* not completed

. Baker v Willoughby and Jobling v Associated Dairies are contrasting cases which illustrate the courts' approach to which causation problem?

The eggshell skull correct incorrect

Concurrent causes correct incorrect

Unknown causes correct incorrect

Supervening causes correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following statements is not true of Bailey v Ministry of Defence?

The claimant sustained brain damage following a cardiac arrest correct incorrect

The claimant was unsuccessful due to her inability to establish causation correct incorrect

Cumulative factors combined to cause her damage correct incorrect

The defendants had not been negligent in relation to her post-operative care correct incorrect