* not completed

. What case laid down the fundamental test for determining duty of care?

Bourhill v Young correct incorrect

Donoghue v Stevenson correct incorrect

Heaven v Pender correct incorrect

Yeun Kun Yeu v Atty-Gen of Hong Kong correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following is not a policy factor which may come into the duty of care question?

The neighbour test correct incorrect

The impact on the insurance market correct incorrect

The floodgates possibility correct incorrect

Social morality correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following cases was representative of a widening of liability in negligence?

Hill v CC West Yorkshire correct incorrect

Rondel v Worsley correct incorrect

Marc Rich v Bishop Rock Marine correct incorrect

Anns v Merton LBC correct incorrect

* not completed

. The Caparo test for duty of care provides that three factors must be taken into account. Which of the following is not included?

'Fair, just and reasonable' correct incorrect

Proximity correct incorrect

Morality correct incorrect

Foreseeability correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following is not a required element in establishing a negligence action?

Breach of duty correct incorrect

Malicious intent on the part of the defendant correct incorrect

Duty of care correct incorrect

Causation of damage of a legally recognised type correct incorrect

* not completed

. Why did the claimant in Donoghue v Stevenson bring her action in tort instead of contract?

Because the claimant had not actually purchased the ginger beer herself correct incorrect

Because the purchaser of the ginger beer was indirectly injured correct incorrect

Because the seller of the ginger beer was not responsible for the snail in the bottle correct incorrect

Because the presence of the snail was a defect in quality rather than a danger correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following best describes the main function of 'duty of care' in negligence?

It ensures that the correct defendant is sued correct incorrect

It ensures that the claimant is always within the time limit for bringing an action correct incorrect

It ensures that the tort of negligence does not extend too widely correct incorrect

It ensures that the wrongdoer has actually been careless correct incorrect

* not completed

. Which of the following statements best describes the outcome of Hill v CC West Yorkshire?

The plaintiff was successful because the police ultimately prosecuted the murderer correct incorrect

The plaintiff was unsuccessful because her claim was out of time correct incorrect

The defendant was successful because they had not been in breach of duty correct incorrect

The plaintiff was unsuccessful because there had not been proximity between the defendants and the victim correct incorrect

* not completed

. What is meant by 'incremental' development of the law?

The law should be developed according to the principles of European law correct incorrect

Each case is to be considered according to analogy with earlier comparable decisions correct incorrect

Precedent must be followed whenever possible correct incorrect

The law should be developed by academics as well as judges correct incorrect

* not completed

. Duty of care in that type of situation was not the issue in Palsgraf v Long Island Railroad. What was the issue?

Duty of care in a novel scenario correct incorrect

Policy implications in duty of care correct incorrect

Duty of care to the particular claimant correct incorrect

Breach of duty in combination with causation correct incorrect