- Be able to explain the following key distinctions, their historical importance, and their limitations in practice:
- Killing versus letting die;
- Intending versus foreseeing harmful outcomes;
- Withholding versus withdrawing life-sustaining treatments; and
- Sustenance technologies versus medical treatments.
- Explain the essential elements in a professional model of “due care” and how these elements relate to the issue of professional malpractice.
- List and explain the necessary conditions for overriding the prima facie obligation to provide or continue medical treatment.
- List and explain the qualifications for surrogate decision makers for noncompetent patients.
- Explain the concept of group harm in research, and offer examples to illustrate.