Analyze the logical apparatus used in the particular rules of evidence below. Then answer the question that follows.
Rule 104: Preliminary Questions Relevancy conditioned on fact -- When the relevancy of evidence depends upon the fulfillment of a condition of fact, the court shall admit it upon, or subject to, the introduction of evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition.
Assume the following key:
(A) The relevancy of evidence depends upon the fulfillment of a condition of fact. (B) The court shall admit it. (C) Evidence sufficient to support a finding of the fulfillment of the condition is introduced.
Which of the following best captures the logical structure of the argument?
Rule 413. Evidence of Similar Crimes in Sexual Assault Cases -- In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault is admissible, and may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.
Assuming the following key:
(A) In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault is admissible. (B) In a criminal case in which the defendant is accused of an offense of sexual assault, evidence of the defendant's commission of another offense or offenses of sexual assault may be considered for its bearing on any matter to which it is relevant.
Printed from , all rights reserved. © Oxford University Press, 2024
.png){kind=icon}