Figure 10.3

Is it a quantitative restriction? See Case 2 slash 73 Geddo v Ente Nazionale Risi total or partial restraint of imports, exports or goods in transit. If yes, Consider justification under Article 36 T F E U Is there an applicable ground? If no, the measure breaches Article 34 TFEU. Is it a quantitative, if no, Is it an M E Q R? See Case 8 slash 74 Procureur du Roi versus Dassonville trading rules enacted by M S, capable of hindering, directly or indirectly, actually or potentially. If yes, Selling arrangement? Apply Joined Cases C 267 and 268 slash 91 Keck; If yes, discriminatory. If yes, Directive 70 slash 50 does the M E Q R apply equally to domestic and imported products, that is, is it indistinctly applicable? If yes, Consider Case 120 slash 78 Cassis de Dijon:1 is principle of mutual recognition and 2. Rule of reason justifiable? Non-exhaustive list. Note also could be considered under Article 36 TFEU. If yes, Arbitrary discrimination or disguised restriction on trade? Case 40 slash 82 Commission v UK Poultry Meat. If no, Proportionate? See Case 261 slash 81 Walter Rau. If yes, the measure does not breach Article 34 TFEU. If no, the measure breaches Article 34 TFEU. Directive 70 50 if no, Consider justification under Article 36 TFEU, Is there an applicable ground? Consider case, if no, the measure breaches article 34 T F E U. There is a dotted line from consider case 120 slash 78 to consider justification.

Figure 10.3 Article 34 TFEU

Back to top